PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 2444
   
Award No. 34
   
Case No. 47
   
Docket No. MW 80-74
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
to and
Dispute Southern Pacific Transportation Company
  
(Texas and Louisiana Lines)
Statement 1. Carrier violated the effective Agreement when Laborer
of Donald N. Stamps was unjustly dismissed on March 5,
claim 1980.
2. Claimant Stamps shall be reinstated to his former
position with pay for all time lost, vacation, seniority
and all other rights unimpaired.
Findings The Board, after hearing upon the whole record and all
 
evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier
 
and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor
 
Act, as amended, that this Board is duly constituted
 
by Agreement dated July 19, 1979, that it has jurisdiction
 
of the parties and the subject matter, and that the
 
parties were given due notics of the hearing held.
 
Claimant, a Laborer is Houston Division Extra Gang 243,
 
was notified, under date of March 10, 1980 by the Regional
 
Maintenance of Way Manager as follows:
  
"You were instructed by Foreman Al Hahn on
  
March 5, 1980 to unload anchors from the truck,
  
and you stopped during your job and went to
  
the bus and sat down and ate your lunch at
  
10:15 AM. You were absent from your job assignment
  
without proper authority which is in violation
' of Rule M811 of the General Rules and Regulations
of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company.
Rule M811 reads in part as follows:
L(/L/U 
- Award No. 34
 
Page 2
'Rule M811: Employees must not absent
themselves from their places .... without
proper authority.'
For your violation of Rule M811., you are dismissed
from the service of the Southern Pacific Transportation
Company..."
A hearing was requested and granted and held on March
25, 1980. As a result thereof Claimant was advised
under date of March 21, 1980 that the dismissal as outlined
in the letter of March 10, 1980 would stand.
The Board finds that Claimant received'the due process
to which entitled under his discipline rule.
There was sufficient evidence adduced to support the
conclusion reached by Carrier.
In view of Claimants short period of service with Carrier
the Board finds that the discipline assessed is reasonable.
This Claim will be denied.
Acrd Claim denied.
'M."'A. tie, Employed Man or C. B. Goyne, ier Member
L%/
  
4~z~?z 
~tc
Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman
 
and Neutral Member
Issued at Wilmington, Delaware, April 16, 1981.