PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 2529
Joseph Lazar, Referee
AWARD NO. 14
CASE NO. 17
PARTIES ) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
TO ) and
DISPUTE ) FORT WORTH AND DENVER RAILWAY COMPANY
STATEMENT 1. That the Carrier violated the Agreement when
OF CLAIM: they withheld Trackman W. W. Sanders from
service between the dates of December 7, 1981
and January 5, 1981, said action being unjust
and in abuse of discretion.
2 That Claimant W. W. Sanders shall be compen
sated for loss of earnings, including overtime,
suffered account the Carrier's improper action.
FINDINGS: By reason of the Memorandum of Agreement signed
November 16, 1979, and upon the whole record and
all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are employe
and carrier within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,
and that it has jurisdiction.
Carrier's Exhibit No. ld, letter of Director of
Labor Relations and Personnel, dated July 23, 1982, addressed to the
General Chairman, quotes Extra Gang Foreman Kelly and L.L. Mott, saying, in part: ". .'I told him to get a doctor release before coming
to work or talk to Roadmaster Baca. He did not do either one when I
was foreman on extra Gang #3.1"
rLB - 2529
AWARD NO. 14 (page 2)
CASE NO. 17
The organization does not deny that Claimant
was told "to get a doctor release or talk to
Roadmaster Baca
."
Clearly, claimant was not withheld from service on December 7.
If it was his choice not to get a doctor release, he could go talk
to Roadmaster Baca. His right to go back to work was qualified.,
however, by the condition that he talk to Roadmaster Baca if he
chose not to get a doctor release; but this condition was perfectly
reasonable in the light of the circumstances in this case, and the
organization has not questioned it here.
The evidence of record shows that Claimant
did
not follow the instruction "to get a doctor release before coming
to work or talk to Roadmaster Baca." Claimant
held himself
unavailable for service between the dates of December 7, 1981 and January
5, 1982. His claim is without merit.
A W A R D
1. The Carrier is not in violation of the Agreement.
2. The Claim is denied.
JOSEPH LAZAR, CHAIRMAN AND NEUTRAL MEMBER
S. E. FLEMING, EMPLOYE MEMBER B. J. MASON, CARRIER MEMBER
DATED: 41r=z
Z.
(t e3