PUBLIC LAW BOA13D NO. 2774
Award No. 150 -
Case No. 1.50
I=1-"1r,_TII-S Brotherhood of Maintenarce
of
Way Employes -
TO DI SF'U'fI'=:
ritehison. Topeka. R< Sante:, Fe Railway Company -
_'Tf
M-IIENT "I. Thai: tho c'.,,rrier violetted the prov.i~ions
OF, CLAW, of the current (1r)rcement when, on June 20*
1.955, it, dismissed Tr<;c!:nj~rn D.r.Svji ft ba=acrd -
on unproven chargen, s:ad action being -
capricious, unwarranted and without Ju=t
cause.
2. Claimant will now be reinstated to his
former position with v-en.iority arid all
other ric!hts restored unimpaired. "
i=T
FiDT!IV'S:
Upon the whole record, after hearing, the Board finds that. thc_2 -_
parties herein are Carrier and Employees within the meaning of -
the Railway Labor fact, as amended, and that this Board is dLAIy
constituted under Public Law 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the
par tics and the- subject matter.
On April 1t, 1.985, while working, Claimani was apparently hit: by
:~ frE·11rjvi employee who sin=; wielding e, maul. Fii_=, fellow cmplco;ec·
~r~iessec~ the
spiLke
which the c-jas atternpling to put in --ind struck -
Claimant in the lower shin wh.reupon Claimant jum!:,cd tIZICl--4Jard-; in
<, twi>tir,n motion and allc:·qedly suffered a ba<cL: injury -ac_ a
I.·-trit
m f that movement. Shortly after that incident. he reported
-r-7y-~sD
Lhe accident to tii·~ for-r·man hr_rt (J(_'r.-linr;d medical attentrc)n tV,a!`
clay «nd continued to worl·.. On the next work day, the follorainq
Monday, as tile day
4101'r~
or-., Claimant Telt considerable
pL,III
<,nd
,.rl4lrr aac:.l ic·d the F oremarr fur mf2dica1 at tent.1on. Tltc Foreman toc.iL_
Claimant to the doctor who confirmed the fact that. Claimant had ct_
hack strain and suggested that Claimant see his pc,·rsona1
play=-.c-,an. Thereafter Claimant wa·; unable to viori: effeci_.~.ve:l; and
·_.tartir,u with April 17, he
secured
permission to to abscc,r.t and
continued to be on sick leave. By letter drated Play 16, (:zirr-icrr
in~lormed Claimant of pending investigation and charged- him wi.ttt_
,-Alleged
misrepresentation
of the facts with respect i= o the-
,.,lleqe:d person a1 injury Of April 11th. The investigator/ hearingwas held on June 200, 1985 and upon the conclusion of the hearinq,Claimant was removed from service-for hi=_ alleged quilt of the -
charge. The record also indicates that Carrie·r's Claim Depar-tmrnt
executed a settlement and release for Claimant on April 27, 1.986
for the alleged injury. The settlement was for the sum of somer;2 ,50D and released Carrier from all labor claims for wanes as
rcssr-alt of the dispute? herein. It is noted that the
release,
however,
did
not include pending claims for reinstatement.
L-.:zrri,vr- ailoyes simply that Claimant was found quilt/ of
UIQ=
charges after at fair and impartial investigation and thrt_
discipline was warranted and justified. Carrier's positic,n i,.-
a~
y-is~
that the buck strain was caused (?y C1nimant-moving furniture
on
Ulf.,
we:A·r:rnd followinn the al. leged occident e:nd t_horc fr·rr· th:u
.:ee::c:::r.<:1cill:. rLs:elf did not: cause any inj r-rr"y. For thit, r-cnaseln C:arr-i.r.r-
convinced that.
its ch~irgpof mis>rcprosentation was an =
,appropriate one.
The Organization,
in its testimony and in i.ts. -arrlr.ari:ent,
indicates that there was sufficient ev.idenceto support the
prnqro=~it.ion that Claimant-was st.rue4; by tho n:auel In the enUrs::e, of
wosrkineel and furt.tier that he jumped backwaird·s when Struct: ,
·Araininq his back. Thorefore, since there o-ia_=. no doubt whatever= .
that CI aimant
was struck and injured his (.rack when he jeirtiped
barrkr.iia,rds, his claim for on duty injury was appropriate:: arid all
Of Carrier's actions were to dilute the liability, accords.nq Lothe Orqani=anon. The Organization insists that s3.nrce there was a
r4·r_ngn.i.tion of the on-duty injury by the Claim fspartment, it wase)DVIOLAS treat the Claimant ought to be reinstated.
:`re=.
thri i:'oard e>;amine-:d tho transcript, of the i.nve=ta-l-,t.ion, .-.tnd
-h:r: enLj.r-L record
of
this
matter,
i,,t_is
apt
j. arena: that the-·rL i.r,
i.r,s:uff.iccierrt evidence
to sustain the c-I-rarge levelled against=
Cl=iam~crrh- Thr:·r·e were contradictions betweep the wr3A(e·n ~.t:at.errre:~ret
.:,.-r-,e, e,,,ri by Carrier and the tes1.imony at the h~-,ar:Lno and a.rr
'a-n
y- /5-0
,it
.nt~rzi there x= no
-.tthpnrt ttIn charm,
rrtr_:=rl h~ L,l.:ir.rr~s.r~t
r
C',
x
1
7b:l.~:atu niC·rl t
°: hn;x i d Lie
Tha·rW are,
r-e:a.nsi.ated
tG
any rnnmn_t-_xry :wl-.,i-;xnl:xal
.f mi,~'~r'c:pres cntmC.3.o n
,.,_,..._.,r.i.. hip:
thc_ Bo <;rd
t7is tyr-myr
maxrnrmar°mi but. wi.thotti, cc?rtnpnn=.~:,tion for
i
iRt)F F·'·
t F. Fcose, Employe Member
Cttic.c,qu, Tl linois
ll. V1CI;Pltilt,:
Lu
In wx.cw of the
l~L,~i.,r_..
claim nn.t~t Lu t r.·s:l.rit:'l.i_d to
concludes.
t'fmL h1W tlnWwi.
position- s4xtt ail miglvts
time tosi_
Claim sr.tst<mned; Claimant shall be r-e:aGrrd,.t.G
has tarmc^r position with all rights unifripzilrod
but will not, rer~-Ye-y.:ry ment fur- time lost-
Carrier will comply with the Award herein viithi.n
30 day's from the date hereof.
L't. L ie6e
mark
Neutral Member
G.P4.
Garmon
, Carrier-