PUBLIC LAW BOARD
NO.
2774
Award
No.
44
Case
No. 53
PARTIES Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
TO and
DISPUTE Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
STATEMENT "1. That the Carrier violated the Agreement
OF CLAIM between the parties when on June 19, 1981,
they dismissed Valley Division's Student
Foreman, C. W. Patterson, said dismissal _.
being arbitrary, excessive and in abuse of
the Carrier's discretion.
2. That C. W. Patterson be restored to his
former position with seniority, vacation
and all other rights unimpaired and ad
ditionally be compensated for loss of
earnings suffered account the Carrier's
improper action."
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties
herein are carrier and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as amended, and that this Board is duly constituted under Public
Law 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter.
The record indicates that claimant had been employed as a Trackman by
Carrier on November
30,
1979. On January 16, 1980, he had been made a
Student Foreman. Following a formal investigation, conducted on May 22,-
1981, he was removed from service and discharged by Carrier for allegedly
falsifying his time records for the dates of April
13,
14, 29 and
30,
1981.
The record indicates that carrier found that the Claimant had falsified-
. - yq-~.~y
_z_
his time payroll records by claiming five hours on April 13, 1981,
and eight hours on April 30, 1981, which had not been worked. In his
testimony, at the Investigation, Claimant indicated that with respect to
April 30th, he did not work on that date and had made an effort to remove
the eight hours from his time sheet but the sheet was inadvertently turned
in with the eight hours for the 30th still reflected. Concerning April--13t
the Organization indicates that on that date, Claimant had banked certain
hours for overtime work by the gang to which he had been assigned and
his actions in claiming the five hours was perfectly appropriate.
An analysis of the record indicates that as a young student foreman
Claimant had been responsible for his own time on his assignments and he
had worked on several different positions with different hours during
the period involved. Some of his work and pay involved time outside the
normal hours of an assignment. It is apparent that there was considerable
confusion with respect to the accounting methods used in recording the
time for at least one of the major assignments to which Claimant had
been assigned during the period of time under invest~gation. Nevertheless;with respect to at least one of the dates, April 30th, it is apparent
that Claimant, whether by accident or otherwise, did indeed seek to be
paid for time not worked. Under all the circumstances the Board is of
the opinion that the discipline in this instance was harsh and unnecessaril
arbitrary. Thus, the conclusion is reached that Claimant should be
reinstated to his former position as a Trackman with' all rights unimpaired
PLB-2774
. AWD. N0. 44
CASE N0. 53
-a-
but without compensation for time lost. The period out of work shall be
considered to have been a disciplinary suspension and it must also be
noted that his reinstatement, under these circumstances, should not under
any circumstances preclude future consideration for promotion for this
employee.
AWARD
1. Claimant shall be reinstated to his
former position with all rights unimpaired since the discipline accorded
was both harsh and unnecessarily severe.
2. Claimant shall not receive pay for time
lost and the time out of service shall
be considered to have been a disciplinary
suspension.
ORDER
Carrier will comply with the Award herein within
thirty days from the date hereof.
i ,.
~T
I. M. Lieberman, Neutral Chairman
. ~'1.~1.t'1.~, LI
G. M. Garmon, Car ier Member 5. E. Fleming, Employe Member
February 8 , 1983
Chicago, IL