PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM:







OPINION OF THE BOARD:
This Board, upon the whole record and all of the evidence, finds and holds that the Employe and the Carrier involved in this dispute are respectively Employe and Carrier within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
On September 23, 1981, the Claimants were jointly directed to attend an investigation on the following charge:



PLB - 2960 Awd. 1#59

The investigation was held after a postponement on October 13, 1981. On October 16, 1981, the Claimants were assessed the discipline now on appeal before the Board.
A review of the transcript convinces the Board that both Claimants bore a responsibility in the accident. There is simply no evidence to indicate that the accident was caused by anything other than lack of close observation by the Operator and the Groundman who were assigned for such a

purpose.

The remaining question relates to the quatum of discipline. The Organization argues it is excessive. Thirty days is certainly a firm penalty. However, few accidents with a crane can be viewed as more serious than a collision with overhead wires. The potential danger of such an accident can hardly be questioned.


AWARD: The Claim is denied.

-G7 Vernon, Chairman

Rarper,- mp oye em er

Dated: un

Crawford, arrie~er-