PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 3308
Award No. 14
Case Dig. 14
PX71TIES Brotherhood of raintenance of Way Employes
TO
DISPUTE The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Gompany
STATE"r
OF CLAIM "Claim that former Illinois Division Trackman
S. L. Hettina?r be reinstated with seniority,
vacation, all bF·ncfit rights unimpaired and paid
for all wage loss and/or otherwise made whole,
account the claimant's name being improperly
removed frar. the seniorit_- roster for failure to
tile his address after he was force reduced."
FINDINGS Upon the whole record, the t_oard finds that the parties
herein are Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the -,railway
Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board is duly constituted ;eider
Public Lax 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject
matter.
claimant was employed as a trackman on Carrier's Illinois jivision.
in a letter dated
November 25, 1981, Claimant was advised thats
"This is to confirm that close of work
November 27, 1981 you are off-in-force reduction,
subject to recall per Rule 2 Section C of the
Maintenance of Kay Agreement in part as followss
'Employes laid off in fcrcc reduction
shall retain their seniority provided
they (1) file their addresses in
writing within fifteen (15) calendar
days after being displaced; and (2)
promptly report in writing any su:,,sequent changes in their addresses. The
reporting required herein must be
addressed to the Division Engineer.
Failure to meet any of the requirements as above
specified, failure to report on the Satc -Indicated
Award No. 14
- 3.90$
Page No. 2
in the notification of recall, not to exceed
fifteen (15) calendar days from date of notificatioa of recall forwarded to the employe's last
known address, without a satisfactory reason,
will result in forfeiture of seniority in the
class where recalled.'."
In a letter dated December 21, 1981, Claimant was further
advisedi
'!In accordance with Rule 2, Section C of the
Agreement, Brotherhood of Maintenance of
Way Rmployes, your name is
being removed
from
the Illinois Division Trackman seniority
Rester effective December 21, 1981 for failure
to file your address in writing within fifteen
(15) calendar
days
after being
displaced.,,
Tlna dais now before the Board was filed by the Crganization in
a letter'datsd
February 24, 1982.
Initially the Carrier takes the position that the cispute was
not timely filed in accordance with the provisions of L<ute 1=,
Section (a)(1)of the Agreement reading in parts
'(a)
All
claims or grievances must be
presented in writing by or on behalf
of the employe involved, to the
officer of the company authorized to
receive same, within
sixty
(60) days
from the date of the occurrence cn
which the claim or grievance is
based xx:ac. "
The Board holds that the date on which the tine limit began to
run, in the claim now before it, was the date of Carrier's letter
dated Decarber 21s 1981. Since the dispute was not initiated with
the Carriftr ustii the Organization's letter of February 24, 1952,
it eras beyond the sixty (60) day requirement of the Agreement.
PLB - 3308
Award ":o. 14
Pace ":o. 3
The Hoard finds Carrier's procedural objection well founded.
It cannot ignore or refuse to enforce valid objections because they
are of a technical nature. Many decisions of varioue Divisions of
the National Railroad Adjustment Foard have held that we are without
jurisdiction to hear clairs and/or -:rievances which have not been
presented and/or progressed in accordance with contractually imposed
tine limits,
For the reasons hereir_above stated, we are precluded from
considering the merits, therefore, the claim must be dismissed.
Even if ve vere able to consider the merits, the claim in without
Agreement support. The record reveals that Claimant did not file
his address within fifteen calendar days as required by the ::__^_reement.
AWARD Claim dismissed.
2
Clarenc~ gtcn
';eutral r1em1
~i
Z
4.A
A A,
arr er Member(
organization
i:2m`
er
Dated at Chicago, Illinois
March 1, 1983