PARTIES TO DISPUTE :

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES

And

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM :


FINDINGS :

During a routine audit of receipts submitted by Amtrak, Carrier discovered that on August 30, 1982 a form had been submitted on behalf of Claimant for travel between Charlotte, North Carolina and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Claimant was authorized to travel no farther than Charlottesville, Virginia, and further investigation revealed that a person other than Claimant had used the authorization to travel to Philadelphia on Amtrak.


- Case No. 16







!('

issued to him for his personal use. Further, Claimant admitted that he knew the form was to be used only for his personal transportation to and from work, and stated that he would repay the value of the ticket ($77.00) by January 10, 1983 (the hearing was held December 28, 1982)_ As of the date the dispute was

submitted to this Board, Claimant had not repaid the requisite amount.'

From the foregoing, it is clear that Claimant altered the Form #620 for the use of his sister, and that such alteration and use, without reimbursement of Carrier by Claimant, constituted a misappropriation of Carrier funds. This was a dishonest act for which dismissal would be warranted even if Claimant had been an employee of long standing. Accordingly, the claim must be denied in its entirety.


AWARD :





                        -ell j

                          rrier Me ber'


                        Organ tuber


Date: ~~ll! /. ~ /