PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 3514
Case No. 116
PARTIES
to
DISPUTE: Consolidated Rail Corporation
Award No. 103
Brotherhood of Maintenance of -Way Employes
- and
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Appeal of Welder R. J. Higgins to have
30 days suspension removed.
FINDINGS: . Subsequent toan investigation held on February 1,``1985, the Claimant was .found guilty on January 8, 1985, of - -failure to follow his Supervisor's instructions.
The Organization strenuously protests the Carrier's actions
both on procedural grounds and with respect to the substance of
the charge. It essentially argues that the Claimant was prejudged,
as evidenced by the hearing transcript. Moreover, also relying
mainly-on- the testimony. adduced durin5.the-.investigation,--it
asserts
that -the Ca=rier has not met
i£s
-widen of Vproof . -- `- ---
We have thoroughly reviewed the record before us and, while
we recognize the Organization's contentions with respect to
prejudgment, we conclude that the Claimant was afforded the
essentials of due proecess protections.
With respect to the substance of the Carrier's charge, we find
that the Claimant was in error in his actions. Failure to follow
legitimate instructions is a serious offense for which the
Carrier may take appropriate disciplinary measures. However, in
C-116/A-103 -2-
this case, a close review of the relevant testimony and the
circumstances leads this Board to conclude that the discipline '_
--assessed was overly harsh and excessiveAWARD .
The claim is sustained to the extent that the suspension
is reduced to fifteen (15) days. -
lG
. J. Dom lski Eckehard Muessig . P.~ Cassese
Carrier ~mber _ Neutral Member Employee Member
Dated:
FES 27 1986 _