PARTIES Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Emoloyes
to --and
DISPUTE: Consolidated Rail Corporation

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:




FINDINGS:-- The essential elements of this claim-involve the Carrier's application of its Drua Testing Policy. _ This rolicy, in pertinent part, provides that an employee whose first drug_test is positive will have an opportunity for an evaluation by the Carrier's Employee Counselina__Service. The employee then, in effect, has the following choices.







The organization has strenuously argued before this Board with we11reasoned contentions, both procedural and substantive, that the claim must be sustained. The Board has carefully considered the Organization's advocacy on this matter and, while the Organization's views are not without merit, we find that the Carrier's position must prevail. In this respect, we particularly note that the Carrier's policy and similar drua addiction policies, have been upheldon numerous occasions by arbitral authority in this industry.
With respect to this claim, the evidence shows that the Claimant failed to comply with the Carrier's April 3, 1987 letter which in-
PLB No. 3514 C-312/A-312
Pave 2

structed him to rid his system of Cannabinoid and Provide a -heaative urine sample within 45 days.





F. J. Domzdl~' i Ecte and Mues is _- J. P. Cassese -
CalYrier M6wer Neutral Me er Employee Member
Dated: ~y~usT 31/Q~