r
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 3539
Award No. 15
Docket No. 21
Carrier's File 310-577
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
to and
Dispute: Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
Statement
of Claim: "1, Carrier violated the effective Agreement
when Grinder Operator Jimmie St. Andre was not
permitted to work beginning June 24, 1983."
"2. Claimant St. Andre shall now be paid for
eight (8) hours each work day, including holidays
and any overtime which would have accrued to him
had he been permitted to return to work,
beginning June 24, 1983, continuing until
permitted to fill his position as Grinder
Operator." (310-577)
Findings: The Board, after hearing upon the whole record
and all evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier and
Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
amended, that this Board is duly constituted by Agreement dated
January 5, 1959, that it has jurisdiction of the parties and the
subject matter, and that the parties were given due notice of
the hearing held.
The Claimant in this case was medically disqualified
from the service back on June 16, 1983, in light of the medical
findings taken from a routine physical examination which indicated that the employe was suffering from a grand mal seizure
disorder. The very existence of a seizure disorder is
353
9-1.r
recognized as a disqualifying condition under the Carrier's
published medical standards. Subsequently, there was a
considerable exchange of correspondence between the parties
regarding the nature and the extent of the Claimant's seizure
disorder. During this period of time, it was determined that
the Claimant was also suffering from a serious substance abuse
problem, which of itself, was also a disqualifying condition
under the Carrier's published medical standards.
After a rather lengthy period of
the Carrier offered in disposing of the
the Claimant to the service provided
disorder was shown to be under control and provided
enrolled in and continued to actively participat Carrier's Employe Assistance Program. This actio atleast in part, due to certain medical statements furnished by
the Claimant's personal physician, which suggested the seizure
condition was under control. The issue of substance abuse
however still remained. Despite repeated invitations having
been extended by the Carrier's Employe Assistance Counselors to
the Claimant, Mr. St. Andre refused to become involved in the
Program. In effect, the Claimant rejected the Carrier's offer.
It is universally accepted that a Carrier retains the
right to establish and maintain employee medical standards
provided, of course, its findings are not arbitrary, capricious
or exercised in bad faith or for the purpose of circumventing
the terms of the Agreement. Here there is no showing that the
Carrier's action represented anything other than the reasonable
exchange,
to return
e
n
correspondence
entire issue
his seizure
the Claimant
within the
was taken,
3 S3q
-15-
exercise of its reserved right to determine whether or not its
employes are physically qualified to perform the work of a
particular position. The Carrier's decision to medically
disqualify this employe was not improper and certainly did not
constitute an agreement violation. The claim to pay for time
lost cannot be sustained.
With regard to the claim for reinstatement, the Board
is not unmindful of the Claimant's fifteen years of service with
the Carrier which would certainly entitle Mr. St. Andre to every
reasonable degree of consideration. We therefore order that the
Carrier renew its offer of reinstatement subject to the
following conditions:
1) Mr. St. Andre will undergo a physical examination
to determine if whether or not his current seizure
condition will permit him to return under the
Carrier's published medical standards.
2) Mr. St. Andre will within thirty days of the date
of the Award enroll in the Carrier's Employe
Assistance Program and his return to service will be
predicated upon first receiving a favorable
recommendation from the Director of the Employe
Assistance Program.
3) Should Mr. St. Andre fail to enroll in the Employe
Assistance Program within the time period as specified
above, the claim as presented here will be considered
denied in its entirety and the case closed.
3
3539-~s
Award: Sustained to the extend outlined above.
1~I:
A. Girist e' , Employee em er annon, Carrier Member
t ur an art, a3.rman
and Neutral Member
Issued October 1, 1986.
4