NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 3689
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
AWARD N0. 7
Case No. 7
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1. Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that the Carrier violated the pro
visions of the current Agreement between the
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees and
the Union Pacific Railroad Company when on June
1, 1984 it coerced Mr. Benson Charley to relinquish
his seniority and resign from the service of the
Union Pacific Railroad Company.
2. That the Carrier will now be required to
reinstate Mr. Charley to his former position with
seniority and all other rights restored unimpaired
and with compensation for all wage loss suffered.
FINDINGS
The circumstances in this claim are somewhat similar
to that reviewed in Award No. 6, which is incorporated herein
by reference.
PLB No. 3689
Award
No. 7
Page 2
Here, the Claimant signed a letter of resignation on
June 1, 1984, which read as follows:
1 June 84
Rawlins wyo
XG 2806
I Benson Charley do hereby resign by position
as extra gang laboer on extra gang
2807
as of this
date 1 June
84.,
Union Pacific Railroad.
/s/ X Benson Charley
Signature
/s/ C. P. Bigelow
Witness
It is difficult to determine whether the "x" stands
for the Claimant's signature (with someone else writing his
name), or whether he actually signed his name.
Here, too,
there is
a statement from the Clerk, which
reads in pertinent part as follows:
On 1 June
84, in
the Rawlins Roadmaster's
office, Mr. Charley signed a letter of resignation
that I witnessed. The circumstances of resigning
was carefully explained by Mr. R.
N.
Hamilton.
Mr. Charley was not coerced, threatened or forced
to sign the letter of resignation. Mr. Charley
may have been drinking the night before, but he
was sober when he signed the
letter at
approximately 11 AM that morning.
PLB No. 3689
Award No. 7
Page 3
The version of what happened is described in the Division Engineer's letter of July 31, 1984, which states in
part as follows:
My investigation into this matter reveals
both claimants knew very well what they were
signing. On June 1, 1984 in the Roadmaster's
office in Rawlins, Wyoming, with witnesses present,
Mr. Charley was advised of the circumstances. It
was explained to him by his supervisor Randy
Hamilton, he had two choices. The first was to
be held out of service pending a hearing and investigation on an alleged Rule G violation (specifically, intoxication) and the second was to sign
a letter of resignation by which his employment
relationship and all seniority rights would be
forfeited. Mr. Charley was also advised that if he
chose to be investigated, he would be so advised
in writing but during the interim could not expect
to reside in the outfit cars since he would be
withheld from service pending an investigation.
Mr. Charley stated he understood and subsequently
chose to resign. He was not tricked into anything
nor was he "told" to resign. He was given a
choice . . . .
The Claimant's version of what occurred is contained
in a letter he wrote (or had written for him) to his General
Chairman on June 26, 1984, in pertinent part as follows:
I was working for K Gang 2806-in Laramie,
Wyo. On June 1st 1984 my foreman pick me up and
told me that I was bump off, without telling me
or explaining he just told me to sign a paper,
which I found out was a resign paper. I found
out about this when I went to the Union Pacific
R/R office here in Gallup. I wonder why I was
never told what I was signing maybe becuz I can't
read real well or not well educated.
PLB No. 3689
Award No. 7
Page 4
I really want to go back to work with the
Union Pacific
R/R. I
think I deserved to get
rehired, for the signing of the paper was never
explained to me . . . .
For the reasons expressed in Award No. 6, the Board
reaches the same conclusion. Doubt as to the actual circum-_
stances must be resolved, in this instance, in favor of the
Claimant.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the extent that the Claimant shall
be offered reinstatement to his former position with seniority unimpaired but without back pay or retroactive benefits.
The Carrier is directed to put this award into effect within
3U days of the date of this award.
HERBERT L. MARX, JR., Chairman and Neutral Member
g.
Ooe
E.R. MYERS, Car ier Member
C.F. FOOSE, Employee Member
New York, N. Y.
DATED:
December 17, 1985