Parties
to the
Dispute
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 3765
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Vs.
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
W. R. Ide Dismissal - request that he be returned to
service and paid for all time held out of service.
OPINION OF THE BOARD
Case No. 16
Award No. 16
Claimant W. R. Ide was employed as a Trackman in April 1973.
On December 4, 1986, he was removed from service account accumulated
a total of 85 demerits. Claimant's last assessment of demerits (30)
was as a result of his failure to protect his assignment on six days
in September 1986.
This Board has reviewed the total record and concludes that Claimant was, as indicated by Carrier, a time and attendance abuser and
that severe discipline was in order. The Board, however, notes that'
Claimant had serious legal problems involving the custody of his
daughter and that during September 1986, when he was absent from
37~' l~
work, he was ordered into court. The Board also notes that Claimant
had such a bad past attendance record that he could not expect any
special consideration from Carrier for any absences.
At the hearing before this Board, Claimant requested an opportunity
to speak and it was granted. Claimant explained his past family
problems and stated that he now has complete custody of his child
and his family problems in that regard are over. He also declared
that if given another chance, he would become an exemplary employe
for Carrier. In light of Claimant's declaration and the circumstances of his absences in September 1986, this Board has concluded
that ,justice would be served in this instance by affording Claimant
the chance he requested. We therefore direct that Claimant be restored to work on a last-chance basis with seniority but without
pay for lost time or benefits. Claimant should be on notice that his
continued employment with Carrier depends on his ability to follow
through on his statement that he will be an exemplary employe. He
shall be required to report to work every day on time and observe all
rules and regulations. Claimant should counsel with his Union representatives and local supervisor to discover just what is required of
him when he finally returns to work.
AWARD
Claim is sustained per Opinion of the Board.
R. '. Dennis, Neutral Member
R. ien, Carrier Member W. E, LaRue, Employe Member
Date of Adoption