PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 3765
:BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
Parties
to the
VS.
Case
Dispute : No. 34
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
The dismissal of Track Foreman R.J.Cousins
for alleged violation of General Rules 10
and 11 (c) was without just and sufficient
cause, on the basis of unproven charges and
in violation of the Agreement.
Claimant Cousins shall be reinstated in the
carrier's service and he shall be
paid
for
all time withheld from service beginning
December 4, 1987.
OPINION OF THE BOARD
R.J. Cousins, the Claimant, was employed by Carrier as
Foreman at Port Huron, Michigan. By letter dated December
16, 1987, he was notified that he was being held out of
service pending an investigation into his alleged
involvement with the removal of Company property from
Lapeer, Michigan, on December 6, 1987. He was also charged
as follows:
`7(
2
- 3 &5 - -?-.s
You are hereby notified to attend a formal
investigation to be held in the Conference Room of the
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Administration' Building,
Flint, Michigan, at 1000 hours on Monday, December 21,
1987, to determine your responsibility, if any, for:
1) Providing Mr. John Ribner with unauthorized
authority to remove scrap railroad material
at Imlay City, Michigan.
2) Providing Mr. John Ribner with unauthorized
authority to remove scrap railroad material
Flint and Port Huron, Michigan.
3) Providing Mr. John Ribner with unauthorized
authority to remove scrap railroad material
at Lapeer and Imlay City resulting in the
removal of Grand Trunk steel by Mr. Ribner
at Lapeer on December 6, 1987.
4) Unauthorized sale of railroad ties to Mr.
John Ribner.
5) Personally receiving payment from Mr. John
Ribner for sale of Grand Trunk track ties.
These are in violation of Grand Trunk General Rules 10
and 11 (e) which state:
Rule 10 Employees are expected to protect
the Company's property and the
property of its customers. If an
employee knows that such property
is endangered in any way, he must
take reasonable steps to protect
and to notify superiors of the
danger.
Rule 11 (e) The unauthorized possession of,
removal or disposal of, any
material from Company property or
property served by the Company is
prohibited.
The hearing was held as scheduled on December 21, 1987. As
a result of that hearing, Claimant was found guilty as charged
and dismissed from service.
37
~s'3
~P
He was notified by letter, dated January 12, 1988, that his
dismissal was for the following reasons. That letter reads
in pertinent part:
1) Providing Mr. John Ribner with unauthorized
authority to remove scrap railroad material
at Imlay City, Michigan;
2) Providing Mr. John Ribner with unauthorized
authority to remove scrap railroad material
at Flint and Port Huron, Michigan:
3) Unauthorized sale of railroad ties to Mr.
John Ribner;
4) Personally receiving payment from Mr. John
Ribner for sale of Grand Trunk track ties.
This Board has reviewed the records and the arguments
presented by both sides. We are persuaded that Claimant
was clearly guilty of charges 1 and 2, and that it was
shown that he did receive money from Mr. John R~bner, which
was retained for his personal use. While there may have
been some ambiguity about Claimant's right to authorize
removal of the ties, there should have been no question
that his conversion of funds received for'Carrier property
constituted theft.
However, in view of the particular facts in this case,
this Board will reinstate Claimant on a last chance basis.
The time he has been out of service shall remain on his
record as a disciplinary suspension, and he is placed on
notice that such action as was involved in this case cannot
and will not be tolerated by his employer.
_ 3?(0~- 3~
FINDING
The Claimant is to be returned to service with seniority and
vacation rights, but without pay for time lost.
6,(
OJ^AAt~
R.E. Dennis, Neutral Member
Jo. A. DeRoche, Carrier Member W.E. LaRue, Employe Member
Date of Adoption