PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 3765
Parties
to the
Dispute
CONSOLIDATED RAIL SYSTEM FEDERATION
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE
OF WAY EMPLOYES
VS.
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN
RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
We wish to appeal the decision rendered in
the case of Mr. Michael R. Ramirez, Trackman,
who was issued discipline in the form of dismissal from service as a result of an investigation held November 11, 1991 at Pontiac,
Michigan.
We would request Mr. Ramirez be returned to
service on this basis.
OPINION OF THE BOARD
Claimant Michael Ramirez entered Carrier's Service on
October 17, 1989. At the time of the incident that gave
rise to his removal from service, he was in furloughed
status. Claimant was notified to report for a return-towork examination on August 13, 1991. Part of that examination was a test of a urine specimen for drugs.
Case No. 55
37~sr ~s
2
Claimant tested positive for cocaine. On August 16, 1991,
he was sent a 45-day letter outlining his options. This
letter reads as follows:
Dear Mr. Ramirez:
The results of your return to work physical
examination revealed a positive detection of
a controlled substance. For this reason, you
are medically disqualified from further work.
Please be advised that you have until 4 P.M.'
on September 30. 1991 to act in accordance
with one of the two options below:
1. produce a negative general drug screen
report (to include a test for THC)
obtained at your expense from the physician of_your choice and subsequently test
negative on a test administered by the GT
Medical Department. You must furnish the
original of the drug screen report and
present yourself for testing at the Medical
Department before 4 P.M.
OR
2. enroll in, and successfully complete, a
rehabilitation program approved by the GT
Manager, Employee Assistance and Rehabilitation. He may be contacted at (313) 396-6654.
Your enrollment must be verified in writing
and received by the Manager, EAP/REHAB before
4 P.M. = us test negative
qn
g general
drug screen
at
=g ime !21 your re-examination
following completion 2f treatment.
Failure to comply with this instruction within this
period, as stated above, will result in further
administrative action which may include dismissal.
Yours truly,
V.J. Gallant, M.D. cc: Manager, EAP/REHAB
Chief Medical officer cc: Personnel
3765 -- ~,r
3
Claimant failed to meet the requirements of the 45-day
letter and was subsequently dismissed from carrier's service.
This Board has reviewed the transcript of the investigation, as well as all of the documents contained in the
record. Based on that review, this Board has concluded that
carrier has consistently applied its drug policy in regard
to employes who test positive for drugs as part of a returnto-work physical examination. All employes in that category
are sent a 45-day letter. That letter outlines what must be
done by the employe in order to be allowed to return to
work. It also clearly states that failure of the employe to
comply can result in dismissal from service.
Claimant in this instance tested positive for cocaine.
He received a 45-day letter and failed to comply with its
terms. That failure resulted in charges, an investigation
' 3~ ~S- 65
4
and Claimant's removal. This Board can find no basis in
this record to disturb Carrier's action.
AWARD
The claim is denied.
RA: Dennis, Neutral Member
t
. Mason, Em
bye
Member R.J. ' en. Carrier Members`'
9P v,
D e of proval