PROCEEDINGS BEFORE PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 3781
AWARD N0. 1
Case No. 1
Referee Fred Blackwell
Carrier Member: R. O'Neill Labor Member: W. E. LaRue
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
Vs.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
STATEZLLNT OF CLAIM: -
Claim of the Brotherhood (CR-138) that:
(a) The carrier violated the effective agreement by
failing to correctly inform Trackman R. E. Orkman of his displacement rights when he was abolished on January 17, 1983.
(b) The Carrier further violated the agreement when it
failed to allow Claimant Orkman to return to service after it was
aware of extenuating circumstances involved preventing the Claimant from making timely displacement.
(c) The Claimant be returned to service with seniority
and all other rights unimpaired and compensated for all time lost
as a result of the Carrier's decision to remove the Claimant from
all rosters.
,FINDINGS:
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended,
and that this Board is duly constituted by agreement and has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.
OPINION
This case arises from the Claimant's appeal and protest
of the Carrier's action of January 31, 1983, whereby the Carrier
1
P.L. Board No. 3781 - Award No. 1, case No. 1
terminated his employment status with the Carrier due to his failure to exercise his seniority in timely manner under Rule 4, Section 2. (b) of the applicable Agreement.
The positions of the Claimant and six (6) other Employees
on Gang 0592, IO Tower, Indianapolis, Indiana, were abolished at
the close of business on Monday, January 17, 1983. At the time of
the abolishment of his position the Claimant had seniority over
Employees working at Avon Yard but he failed to exercise his seniority to displace one of these Employees during the ten (l0) day
period following abolishment allowed by Rule 4, 2. (b) and consequently, by Carrier letter dated January 31, 1983, the Claimant
was informed that his service had been closed out in accordance
with said Rule.
The record indicates that the Track Supervisor at Avon
Yard was a proper official for the Claimant to have presented his
request for names of junior Employees that he could displace.
However, it appears from the record that within the ten (10) day
period the Claimant spoke with his General Foreman who advised him
that no jobs were available and that there were no junior Employees whom he could displace. The record, reflects that the Claimant
received this same information from the Timekeeper when he picked
up his paycheck on January 31, 1983. The statements of the General Foreman and Timekeeper were not correct.
After due study of the foregoing and of the whole record,
inclusive of the parties' arguments in support of their respective
2
P.L. Board No. 3781 - Award No. 1, Case No. 1
positions in the case, the Board concludes that the failure of the
Claimant- to exercise his seniority to displace a junior Employee
within the time period allowed by Rule 4, 2. (b) provided a proper
basis for the Carrier to institute action regarding forfeiture of
the Claimant's seniority under the self-executing provisions of
the Rule. However, even though the Track Supervisor at Avon Yard
was a proper official for the Claimant to have presented his request for names of junior Employees, the record reflects that the
Claimant was erroneously informed by other Carrier officials that
there were no junior Employees subject to his displacement rights.
In these circumstances, while there was a valid basis for the Carrier to take action under the Rule, the Board deems it unsound to
permit the seniority forfeiture to remain in effect permanently.
Accordingly, in view of the foregoing and for the reasons
indicated, the Claimant shall be returned to the seniority roster
in line with his original hire date, and shall be returned to service as warranted by his seniority. The Claimant did not request
compensation for time lost and therefore compensation will not be
allowed.
AWARD:
The Carrier shall return the Claimant to his original
place on the seniority roster, and he shall be returned to service
in line with his seniority with all other rights unimpaired. The
claimant's original claim made no request for time lost and none
3
P.L. Board No. 3781 - Award No. 1, Case No. 1
is allowed.
The carrier shall comPly with this Award within thirty
(30) days,from the date of June 5, 1985.
BY ORDER OF PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 3781.
Fred Blackwell, Neutral Member
cv
y~'~ C'.z
n
R.
OINieill,
Carrier Member W. E. LaRue, Labor Member
Executed on
~i , 1986.
4