Y
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 3781
AWARD NO. 21
Case No. 98
Referee Fred Blackwell
Carrier Member: R. O'Neill Labor Member: W. E. LaRue
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
VS.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the Brotherhood (CR-2575) that:
(a) The dismissal of Claimant Abdul Q. Shahid was arbitrary and capricious, wholly unwarranted, and a violation of Rule 3 of the Scheduled Agreement.
(b) Claimant Shahid shall be reinstated into Carrier's
service with all seniority rights restored.
FINDINGS:
Upon the whole record and all the evidence, after January
18, 1988 hearing in Washington, D. C., the Board finds that they
parties herein are Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board is duly constituted by agreement and has jurisdiction of the parties and of the
subject matter, and that the Claimant, who was duly notified of
said hearing and of his right to be present and participate in
same, did not attend said hearing.
OPINION
This case arises from the Claimant's appeal and protest
of the Carrier's action of April 16, 1986, whereby the Carrier
notified the Claimant that his seniority had been forfeited under
Rule 4, Section 2, of the applicable Agreement due to his failure
1
` 379/-
~i
to exercise seniority within ten (10) days after his disqualification from a position.
The record reflects that the Claimant, with service date
in February 1976, was awarded a bid position as a Machine Operator/Tie Handler in TK-351 Tie Gang, effective March 31, 1986. The
Claimant's seniority date for this job classification is July 5,
1977.
On April 3, 1986, prior to the start of his tour on that
date, the Claimant was advised that he had failed to qualify for
the position and should arrange to exercise seniority. The Claimant failed to exercise seniority within ten (10) days after the
date of disqualification from the Machine operator position,
whereupon, by letter dated April 16, 1986, the Carrier's Division
Engineer, Mr. John Palloni, Jr., advised the Claimant that he had
forfeited his seniority with the Maintenance of Way Department
under Rule 3, Section 5 of the Agreement due to his failure to exercise his seniority as required.
The Agreement provisions pertinent to this dispute are
found in Rule 3, Section 5, and Rule 4, Section 2 of the February
1, 1982 Agreement as follows:
"RULE - SELECTION OF POSITIONS
Section 5. Failure to qualify--Advertised position.
An employee failing to qualify for a position within
thirty (30) days will not acquire seniority dating on the
position for which he failed to qualify and will, within
five (5) working days, return to his former position unless it has been abolished or filed by a senior employee,
in which event he may exercise seniority.
RULE 4
Section 2. Exercise of seniority.
2
(a) Except as otherwise provided, an employee may
exercise seniority to a position for which he is disqualified:
8. When disqualified.
(b) An employee entitled to exercise seniority must
exercise seniority within ten (10) days after the date
affected. Failure to exercise seniority to any position
within his working zone (either divisional or Inter-Regional) shall result in forfeiture of all seniority under
this Agreement, except employees who decline to exercise
Inter-Regional seniority shall only forfeit all Inter-Regional seniority. It he presents evidence to his supervisor that extenuating circumstances prevented the exercise of seniority, the ten (10) days specified above
shall be extended proportionately to the extent of his
absence on account of such circumstances. An employee
who is unable to so exercise seniority and who elects not
to exercise other seniority, shall be furloughed."
After due study of the foregoing and of the record as a
whole, inclusive of the submissions presented by the parties in
support of their positions in the case, the Board concludes and
finds that the record at hand does not provide satisfactory support for the disputed forfeiture of seniority. Accordingly, the
Claimant will be reinstated to service with seniority unimpaired,
but without any back pay.
Specifically, the record fails to establish that, following his April 3, 1986 disqualification from the position of Machine Operator, the Claimant could not have returned to his former
position as permitted by Rule 3, Section 5. Further, the record
reflects that the Claimant lacked sufficient seniority to displace
to three (3) of the six (6) positions said by the Carrier to be
available to him by the exercise of his seniority, and as well
leaves doubt regarding his qualifications for the three remaining
positions.
3
3-7a1 -)-r
Finally, as regards the Claimant's statement that he had
the impression from his contact with the Division Engineer's office that he had ten (10) working days, rather than ten calendar
days, to exercise his seniority after disqualification from the
Machine operator position, the Board notes that the Division Engineer produced no written record of his advice to the Claimant of
his displacement rights when the disqualification arose. Accordingly, the Board deems it appropriate to give the Claimant the
i
benefit of the doubt in regard to this facet of the case and tol,
treat the Claimant's misunderstanding of the ten day provision in
the rule as a mitigating consideration to be weighed in his behalf.
Accordingly, in view of the foregoing and based on the
record as a whole, the Board will direct the reinstatement of the,
Claimant to service with seniority unimpaired. The record reflects that the claim does not include a request for compensation
and therefore, the question of compensation cannot be considered.
AWARD:
The Carrier shall restore the Claimant to his former position on the seniority roster with seniority unimpaired,
but Claimant shall not receive any compensation for time
out of service.
The Carrier shall comply with this Award within thirty
(30) days from the date of March 11, 1988.
BY ORDER OF PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 3781.
4
3781
Fred Blackwell, Neutral Member
r
R. O'Neill, Carrier Member W. E. LaRue, Labor Member
Executed on
'~
, 1988
OP:CON-3781\21-98.503
5