PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4(.)61
Case No. 29
Award No. 29
Parties
to
dis_gu_teg
United Transportation Union
and
Norfolk & Western Railway Company
SStatgme_nt of
claim:
Claim made for and on behalf of Decatur yardman J.
Flagg for reinstatement to the service with pay for all
time lost, including time lost to attend the
investigation held May 27, l986, and his record cleared
of this incident, account failure to comply with
instructions to provide a drug screen urinalysis on
may
7, 1986.
e
Ogini~n o_f_
929C_¢_
Claimant was found positive
on
a drug urinalysis
following a physical examination in 1985. He complied with
the requirement of a negative test within 45 days and was
conditionally returned to service. In Ma;, 1986, he was
marked off. He was called for a train and immediately upon
reporting was notified that he was to be given a urine screen
test.
The organization contends that the call for service was
subterfuge, that the Carrier, in fact, had no shortage of men
and that the call was contrived, an over-reaction to a notice
from the medical office to conduct the test.
There is an indication that was the case. However, the
evidence is not conclusive. The Carrier has an obligation to
execute the drug program fairly, a program held reasonable
and the execution by an overzealous local official should not
impair its effectiveness. In this case we are additionally
shown an arbitrary attitude by the investigating officer
whose decision to disallow certain testimony makes the
question of reversible P:ror a reasonable one for the
organization to raise.
However, the claimant refused to take the test.
Li
o~-~
Findin_gs__
That the agreement was not violated.
Award:
Claim denied.
Dated this 15th day of April, 1987, at St. Louis, Mo.
John B. Cri well, Neutral Member
L. W. Swert, Organization Memb~
e,49 "m4o,~
J
E. M. Martin, Carrier Member
T
Pago
PL H L~n_ al.f, i . G:_,_r - M ~Q