PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4225
Claimant - M. S. Chapa
Award-No. 7
Case No. 7
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
and
Union Pacific Railroad
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Carrier's decision to suspend Claimant from its
service for a period of seven (7) actual days was excessive,
unduly harsh and in abuse of discretion and in violation of the
terms and provisions of the current Collective Bargaining
Agreement.
2. That because of the Carrier's failure to prove and support
the charges by introduction of substantial bona fide evidence,
that Carrier now be required to compensate Claimant for any and
all loss of earnings suffered, and that the charges be removed
from his record.
FINDINGS
Upon reviewing the record, as submitted, the Board finds
that the Parties herein are Carrier and Employes within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act,-as-amended,--and that this
Special Board of Adjustment is
duly
constituted and has
jurisdiction of the Parties and the subject matter; with this
arbitrator being sole signatory.
The Claimant served as a_ Laborer on Gang 7309, Tidewater
1
Southern. On June 28, 1991, he allegedly sustained an injury
when he dropped a claw bar on his left foot. He did not report
the injury. He worked the remainder of that day, which was
Friday, and was offwork until the following Wednesday, July 3,
1991, having taken a personal day on Tuesday. On July 9, 1991,
he filed an accident report, claiming the June 28, 1991 injury.
Two days later, July 11, 1991, the Carrier sent a charge
letter to the Claimant advising him to be present at a hearing
to be held on July 19, 1991, in the Superintendent's conference
room at 833 East 8th Street, Stockton, CA. The purpose of the
hearing was to determine his responsibility in violating the
following rules:
Rule A
Safty is of the first importance in the
discharge of duty. Obedience to the rules
is essential to safety and to remaining in
service.
The service demands the faithful,
intelligent and courteous discharge,
of
duty.
Rule B
Employes whose duties are prescribed by
these rules must have a copy available for
reference while on duty.
Employes whose duties are affected by the
timetable and/or special instructions must
have a current copy immediately available
for reference while on duty.
Employes must be familiar with and obey all
rules and instructions and must attend
required classes. _
If in doubt as to the meaning ofany rule or
instruction, employees must apply to their
supervisor for an explanation..
Rules may be issued, cancelled or modified
by general order, timetable or special
instruction.
When authorized by Superintendent, General
2
~laas
-~
Orders or special instructions may be
cancelled, modified or issued by train order
or Form Q or track rule.
Rule D
Employes must cooperate and assist in
carrying out the rules and instructions, and
must promptly report to the proper officer
any violation of the rules or instructions,
any conditions or practice which may
imperial the safety of trains, passengers or
employes, and any misconduct or negligence
affecting the interest of-the Company.
Rule E
Accidents, fires, personal injuries,-defects -
in track, bridges or signals, or any unusual
condition which may affect the safe and
efficient operation of the railroad, must be
reported by the first means of
communication. Written report must follow
promptly when required.
Rule I
Employes must exercise care to prevent
injury to themselves or others. They must
be alert and attentive at all times when
performing their duties and plan their work
to avoid injury.
Rule 4001
Taking Precaution: Employes must take every
precaution to prevent injury to themselves
and other persons under all conditions not
provided for by the rules.
Employes must not rely entirely upon others,
but must protect themselves when their.own
safety is affected.
Rule 4004 -
Reporting: All cases of personal injury,
while on duty, or on company property must
be promptly reported to proper authority on
prescribed form.
Personal injury occurring while off duty
must be reported to the proper authority as
soon as possible and prescribed written form
completed upon return to service. - .
3
While this Board questions whether the Carrier successfully
proved all the charges against the Claimant, it is clear he
violated Rule 4004 when he did not report his injury in a timely
manner. The only real question for this Board is whether the
Carrier followed the concept of progressive discipline when it
issued a seven (7) day actual suspension.
The Claimant has served the Carrier for over twenty-three
(23) years, having started his service on April 10, 1968. The
only other rule violation listed on his employment record was in
1987, for the-same type of offense, namely the failure to report
a personal injury in a timely manner. The Board recognizes the
Carrier's concern that the Claimant may not have learned his
lesson, from the first rule infraction in 1987, when he was __
issued a Letter of Reprimand. However, in keeping with the
concept of progressive discipline and in consideral.ion of the
Claimant's employment record, we believe a less_sevEre penalty
is in order here, before we arrive at that conclusion.
The Board cautions the Claimant, that in the future he must
immediately report, to the proper authority, any incident
in- -
which he suffers the slightest injury. Furthermore, he should
not consider a co-worker the proper authority. He should also
be aware, as in the instant case, that any time an employe
allows days to elapse before reporting an accident or an injury,
there is cause-to doubt the truthfulness of-the employe's
explanation. -It just is not conceivablethat thepain and
discomfort from aninjury would not show up for an entire week.
4
AWARD
The Claim is sustained in part, the seven (7) day actual
suspension is-to be reduced to a three (3) working days
suspension.
~v
Zarol amp
Neutral
Submitted:
September 26, 1990
Denver, Colorado
5