S. .. w
s S
i~
Award No. 147
Case No. 152
PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4244
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.
AND
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: 1. That the Carrier's decision to suspend
Southern Region, Machine Operator R. D. Turman, from service for thirty
(30) days was unjust.
2. That the Carrier now rescind their decision and pay for all wage loss as a
result of Investigation held 9:00 A.M., October 14, 1994, continuing forward
and/or otherwise made whole, because the Carrier did not introduce substantial,
credible evidence that proved that the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in
their decision, and even if Claimant violated the rules enumerated in the
decision, suspension from service is extreme and harsh discipline under the
circumstances.
3. That the Carrier violated the Agreement particularly but not limited to Rule
13 and Appendix 11, because the Carrier did not introduce substantial, credible
evidence that proved the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in their
decision.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 4244 (the "Board") finds that the
parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as amended. Further, the Board has jurisdiction over the parties and the
subject matter involved.
The record shows that Southern Region Machine Operator R. D. Turman (the
"Claimant") was notified to attend a formal investigation on October 14, 1994,
concerning his alleged being observed reading a newspaper while on duty
in
the
cab of a Hertz Weedmower at MP 374.9, Fort Worth Subdivision, on September
15, 1994, in possible violation of Rules B and 1001 of the Carrier's Safety and
General Rules for All Employees. As a result of the investigation the Carrier
determined that the Claimant violated the cited rules and he was suspended from
service for 30 days.
In summary, Superintendent L. E. Rees and Assistant Superintendent M. L.
Elkins and Roadmaster M. Lynn were hyrailing on the Fort Worth Subdivision
when the Claimant was observed sitting on his mower reading a newspaper. The
hyrail was stopped, and Rees and Lynn approached the Claimant to discuss the
matter. Rees testified that as he and Lynn approached the Claimant, the Claimant
quickly stashed the paper beside the tractor seat. Rees stated that when the
Claimant was asked him why he was reading the newspaper, the Claimant
responded that the newspaper was a substitute for toilet paper and a news story
caught his attention.
The Claimant testified that he had the newspaper with him to dry the seat on the
tractor. He further admitted that he was reading the newspaper when he should
have been working.
There is no dispute that the Claimant was reading a newspaper while on duty.
Moreover, the Board finds that the Claimant should have been attending to his
work responsibilities instead of reading the paper. However, under the
circumstances of this case and after reviewing the Claimant's past work record, the
Board finds that a suspension of thirty days is excessive and it is reduced to ten
days.
AWARD: Claim sustained as set forth above.
. Fisher
Chairman and Neutral Member
C. . Foose Lyle L. Pope
Organization Member Carrier Member
Dated: ~~5
Schaumbu fb, Illinois