PUBLIC LAW BQA12D_N_O_-424_4_____ .__
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND--SANTA FE-RAILWAY CO.
BROTHERHOOD-OF MAINTENANCE= ®E WAY EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CL .AIM: 1..
That=Carter's-
decision
to remove System
Steel, E. J: Morris from. service- was Ainjust.
2. That the Carrier zLOwreinstafe
-Claimant
Morris with. seniority, vacation, all
benefit rights unimpaired and pay for all wages lost as a result of an investigation
held August 17, -1995, at-3:00 P.M., continuing forward and/or otherwise made
whole, because the Carrier did notiatrtrodu~eulstantlal c_re_dible evidence that
proved that the Claimant violated the-ruled enumerated in their decision, and even
if the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in the -decision, removal from service
is extreme and harsh discipline under the circumstances-
3. -
3. That the Carder_violated the Agreement particularly but not limited to Rule
13 and Appendix 11, because the Carrier didnot introduce substantial, credible
evidence that proved the Claimant violated the rules- enumerated in their decision.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 4244 (the "Board") finds that the
parties herein are Carrier and. Employee-within the meaning-of the- Railway Labor
Act, as amended. Further, the Boardhasjurisdiction-over the parties and the
subject matter involved-
In _ _ __ _ ~.._..___ _ . _.
In this dispute System Steel gang member E_ L .-Morris-Tthe-"Claimant") was
absent without authQrity
June 5, 6, 7, 8,
9-and 12, 1995. He wasnotfied in a letter
dated July
6,
1995, -that his seniority aricremployment were terminated because of
his absence without proper authority for more than five consecutive work days.
The Claimant was alsoadyised that
he
could request a formal investigation within
twenty days of the_dateof
the
letter. The-request was. made-by the Claimant
through his designated representative from the Organization. The Carrier then
notified him to attend a formal investigation on August
17,
1995, concerning his
alleged absence> without proper authority for more than five consecutive work days
beginning-Junes, 1995, in possible violation of Rules 1.15 and 1-16 of the Safety
and General Rules_ fo_r_ AII_Employees, Form 2629 standard,- effective September
30, 1994, and as revised. -As-aresult.of the_invesugatiori
;~e Carrier determined
that the Claimant violated-the cited-rules~and he was issued a_Level-6 removal
from services
In summary, the record shows that the Claimant did not -appear for the formal
investigation. Hence, the Board finds 1hatthe discipline assessed the Claimant will
not beset aside. _ . _ _ _ _ _ ___ ~.~_:_ - _
AWARD: Claimdenied.-
__ T .
an . Fisher _~ -`~... ~_, , ..
Chairman an Neutral Member _
.
W~
Clarence F. Foose _ __ ._riffin -
Organization Member - zief Member -
Dated:
7k<
9g
,-. ,
Fort Worth, Texas