Award No. 221
Case No. 233
File No. 180-1313-987.EXP
( BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE
( OF WAY EMPLOYES
Parties to Dispute: ( -and
(
(
(
( BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY
Statement of Claim: 1. That the Carrier's decision to issue a Level 2 deferred
suspension of 10 days, deferred for six months for
Western Region, D. J. Baird from service was unjust.
2. That the Carrier now rescind their decision and expunge
all discipline, and transcripts and pay for all wage loss as
a result of an investigation held 9:30 a.m., March 25,
1998 continuing forward and/or otherwise made whole,
because the Carrier did not introduce substantial, credible
evidence that proved that the Claimant violated the rules
enumerated in their decision, and even if the Claimant
violated the rules enumerated in the decision, suspension
from service is extreme and harsh discipline under the
circumstances.
3. That the Carrier violated the Agreement particularly but
not limited to Rule 13 and Appendix 11, because the
Carrier did not introduce substantial, credible evidence -
that proved the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in
their decision.
Public Law Board No. 4244
Award No. 221
Case No. 233
File No. 180-1313-987.EXP
INTRODUCTION
This Board is duly constituted by agreement of the parties dated January 21, 1987, as
amended, and as further provided in Section 3, Second of the Railway Labor Act ("Act"), 45
U.S.C. Section 153, Second. This matter came on for consideration before the Board pursuant
to the expedited procedure for submission of disputes between the parties. The Board, after
hearing and upon review of the entire record, finds that the parties involved in this dispute are
a Carrier and employee representative ("Organization") within the meaning of the Act, as
amended.
FINDINGS
On March 2, 1998, the claimant, D. J. Baird, was notified to attend a formal
investigation concerning his alleged knowledge of and failure to reveal information regarding
tampering with the timber tongs that were involved in an incident resulting in personal injury
on March 14, 1996. As a result of the investigation, the claimant was issued a Level 2
deferred suspension of 10 days for violating Rules 1.2.7, 1.1.4, 1.6, and 1.4 of the
Maintenance of Way Operating Rules (MWOR) and Rule S-28.2.5 of Safety Rules and
General Responsibilities for All Employees. The Board cannot sustain this discipline for the
following reason.
The rules of the MWOR which the claimant is alleged to have violated became
effective on August 1, 1996, and the Safety Rule which the claimant is alleged to have violated
2
y
Public Law Board No. 4244
Award No. 221
Case No. 233
File No. 180-1313-987.EXP
was effective as of March 1, 1997. The incident at issue occurred on March 14, 1996. It is a
fundamental and basic principle of labor relations that an employee can only be charged and
found to have violated rules that were in effect at the time of the incident. An employee
cannot be charged and found to have violated rules that became effective the alleged
misconduct. The record reveals that the Carrier has charged the claimant with violating rules
that were not in effect at the time of the incident at issue. The record also reveals that the
Organization made a timely objection to the claimant being charged with violating rules that
were not in effect at the time of the incident. Therefore, the Board need not reach the merits
of this case because the Carrier failed to charge and find the claimant in violation of rules that
were in effect on March 14, 1996, the date of the incident. The claim
is
sustained.
AWARD
The claim is sustained.
Thomas M. Rolaling, Carr' ember R. B. Wehrli, Employee Member
onathan I. Kleiri, Neutral Member
This Award issued the,
6
day
ofN S
U,
1998.
3