PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4244
Award No. 255
Case No. 262
File No. 80-FR9413-006.EXP
t niculkir,KtlUUD OF MAINTENANCE
( OF WAY EMPLOYES
Parties to Dispute: (-and(
( BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY
Statement of Claim: 1. That the Carrier's decision to issue a Level i deferred
Suspension for five (5) days with two years probation from
service was unjust
2. That the Carrier now rescind their decision and expunge all
discipline, and transcripts and pay for all wage loss as a result of
an Investigation held at 10:00 a.m. on June 7, 2000 continuing
forward and/or otherwise made whole, because the Carrier did
not introduce substantial, credible evidence that proved that the
Claimant violated the rules enumerated in their decision, and
even if the Claimant violated the rules enumerated in the
decision, suspension from service is extreme and harsh discipline
under the circumstances.
3. That the Carrier violated the Agreement particularly but not
limited to Rule 13 and Appendix 11, because the Carrier did not
introduce substantial, credible evidence that proved the Claimant
violated the rules enumerated in their decision.
Public Law Board No. 4244
Award No. 255
Case No. 262
File No. 80-FR9413-006.EXP
INTRODUCTION
This Board is duty constituted by agreement of the parties dated January 21, 1987, as
Act ("Act"), 45
U.S.C. Section 153, Second. This matter came on for consideration before the Board pursuant
to the expedited procedure for submission of disputes between the parties. The Board, after
hearing and upon review of the entire record, finds that the parties involved in this dispute are
a Carrier and employee representative ("Organization") within the meaning of the Act, as
amended.
FINDINGS
The claimant, R. C. Tannehill, was assigned by the Carrier to the position of patrol
gang foreman for the territory between mile posts 262.4 and 316.0 on the Red Rock
Subdivision. At approximately 5:00 p.m. on May 5, 2000, assistant patrol gang foreman M.
C. Courtney twisted his ankle while working in the vicinity of mile post 281. At
approximately 10:30 p.m. on May 5, 2000, Courtney transported himself to the local hospital
in order to receive medical treatment for his personal injury. During the morning of May 6,
2000, the claimant informed roadmaster L. W. Trimble that Courtney had sustained a personal
injury during his tour of duty the previous day.
2
Public Law Board No. 4244
Award No. 255
Case No. 262
File No. 80-FR9413-006.EXP
On May 18, 2000, the Carrier conducted a conference and issued a letter of discipline
to the claimant which provides, in part, as follows:
This letter will confirm that as a result of our conference on May
18, 2000, concerning your responsibility in connection with late
reporting of injury sustained by M. C. Courtney on May 5, 2000,
you are issued a Level i deferred suspension of five days with
two years probation for violation of Maintenance of Way
Operating Rules 1.2.5 and 1.2.7.
On May 23, 2000. the Organization requested that a formal investigation be conducted
under the provisions of Article 11, Rule 91(2) of the Frisco Agreement. The Carrier
subsequently instructed the claimant to attend an investigation in order to ascertain the facts
and determine his responsibility, if any, in connection with the late reporting of the personal
injury sustained by Courtney on May 5, 2000.
The following Maintenance of Way Operating Rules (MWOR) are applicable to the
instant case. Rule 1.2.5 of the MWOR entitled "Reporting," provides as follows:
All cases of personal injury, while on duty or on company
property, must be immediately reported to the proper manager
and the prescribed form completed.
A personal injury that occurs while off duty that will in any way
affect employee performance of duties must be reported to the
proper manager as soon as possible. The injured employee must
also complete the prescribed written form before returning to
service.
3
Public Law Board No. 4244
Award No. 255
Case No. 262
File No. 80-FR9413-006.EXP
Rule 1.2.7 of the MWOR entitled "Furnishing Information," provides as follows: "Employees
must not withhold information, or fail to give all the facts to those authorized to receive
information regarding unusual events, accidents, personal injuries, or rule violations."
The record establishes that assistant patrol gang foreman Courtney, the employee who
sustained the personal injury in this case, reported to and was supervised by the claimant, the
patrol gang foreman. At the investigation, roadmaster Trimble testified that the claimant
informed him on May 6, 2000, that Courtney had sustained an on-duty personal injury at 5:04
p.m. on May 5, 2000, while setting off a high rail. Furthermore, roadmaster Trimble stated
that the claimant informed him that he had completed the patrol of his assigned territory on
May 5, 2000 without Courtney due to the latter's personal injury on May 5. Finally,
roadmaster Trimble stated that he was informed by Courtney that Courtney had notified the
claimant of the fact that he had sustained a personal injury at the time of the incident.
The claimant testified at the investigation that Courtney informed him at the conclusion
of his tour of duty that he was not injured. Thus, there was no injury to be reported to the
Carrier on May 5. The claimant further stated that he was subsequently informed by Courtney
on the morning of May 6 that he had, in fact, sustained a personal injury. According to the
claimant, he promptly notified the Carrier that Courtney had sustained an injury.
There is no dispute in this case that Courtney sustained a personal injury. In order to
resolve this claim, the Board must first determine when the claimant knew that Courtney
sustained an injury. Based upon the testimony at the investigation, the Board finds that the
claimant had knowledge prior to departing the property on May 5, 2000, that Courtney
4
Public Law Board No. 4244
Award No. 255
Case No. 262
File No. 80-FR9413-006.EXP
sustained a personal injury while setting off the high rail. However, the claimant failed to
report Courtney's personal injury to the Carrier on the date when it occurred.
The Board notes that the claimant subsequently informed the Carrier on the morning of
May 6, 2000, that Courtney sustained an on-duty injury. Under the particular facts and
circumstances presented in this case, and in accordance with the standard handling procedure
which the Carrier attempted to apply, the Board finds that the discipline assessed the claimant
was improper. Accordingly, the claimant's discipline shall be modified as more fully set forth
in the Award.
AWAI p
The claim is sustained, in part, as follows. The claimant's five
(5) day Level 1 deferred suspension is hereby reduced to a formal
letter of reprimand, and the claimant's two year probation period
is hereby reduced to one year. The Carrier is to comply with this
Award within thirty (30) days from the date of issuance.
- -
- -==& ~LL
Thomas M. Rohling, C Member R. . Wehrli, Employee Member
Lk-J,
la,-,
Jonathan 1. Klein, Neutral Member
This Award issued the "day of 0ci-o ber , 2000.
5