PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 4262

Parties to the Dispute

AMTRAK SERVICE WOR17M COUNCIL

Va.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

The Organisation seeks the reinstatement of Train Attendant Gary F. Chambers, who,was dismissed on
September 25, 1986.'

Cage No. 44

OPINION OF THE BOARD

By letter dated September 15, 1986, Claimant Gary F. chambers was directed to appear for an investigative into his alleged violation of Rules A and G of the Rules of Conduct. Specifically, it was alleged that


Under the Waiver, Claimant had agreed to enroll in as Amtrak Empbyes Assistance Program and, among other things, submit to and pass a test !or drugs by urine sample each cal endar quarter for a period of


two years. In a urinalysis test conducted on September 11, 1986, Claimant allegedly tested positive for cocaine and marijuana.
Following the investigation, the charges were sustained and Claimant was terminated from service,
The Organization maintained that the Rule G Waiver was ambiguous and not approved by the Organization. Further, the positive urinalysis test results were neither accurate nor valid and Claimant should have been given a copy of the test results.
This Board has reviewed the entire record of this case, including the transcript of the investigation. The Board finds ample basis in the factaof this case for sustaining the discipline imposed. Claimant had been cited for prior instances of intoxication and returned to work on a leniency basis. ,Traces of drugs were found as the result of a properly administered drug screen, after Claimant had been enrolled in an Employee Assistance Program. At the same time, we find no evidence that Claimant requested the test results.
Given Claimant's most recent behavior arid his past record, the discipline imposed was appropriate,

AWARD

Claim denied.





J. Gefa; Fpioye Member W. 0. Cole, Carrier Member

/Yd~'~'~ityc'd .STrS.h~
Date of Adoption