PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4338
PARTIES) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
TO )
DISPUTE) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
SIATSMENT OF CLAIM: That the discipline of thirty days deferred
suspension imposed on Section Foreman L. D. Davis for his alleged
violation of Chief Engineer's Instructions Bulletin CE-87-001-T
be removed and the claimant's record cleared of the discipline.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 4338 finds that the parties
herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board has jurisdiction.
In this dispute the claimant was notified to attend an investigation to develop the facts and determine his responsibility, if any,
in connection with an incident which occurred at approximately 4:45
p.m., Wednesday, April 29, 1987 wherein L. D. Davis, while supervising surfacing equipment to tamp the ,joints on bolted rail of
curve, MP 110.13 to MP 110.91 under a track and time permit issued
12:44 p.m. and extended to 2:45 p.m., failed to place a slow order.
over the work area, as required for continuous welded rail territory and ambient temperatures over 80 degrees fahrenheit, as was
required by Chief Engineer's instruction Bulletin CE-87-001-T
dated April 5, 1987 resulting in derailment of Extra 3636 East.
Pursuant to the investigation the claimant was found guilty and
was assessed thirty days deferred suspension.
The Union objected to the letter of charges on the basis that they
were not precise and that the Assistant Chairman of the Region did
not receive a copy of the letter as provided for in Rule 48(C).
The Board has studied the charges and finds no fault with the
charges. The Assistant Chairman should have received a copy of
the charges, but the Board finds there is no error since he knew
of the charges and was aware of them well in advance of the investigation.
Mr. Richard Ough, Roadmaster, Marysville SubDivision, testified
that the limits between Menoken and Marysville where this problem
arose were on his division, and the claimant worked under his
supervision.
This witness testified that he received a phone call from the
Dispatcher, and pursuant to that conversation, he returned to
Onaga at MP 110.25 and found that a loaded coal train had derailed at that location. He testified there were nineteen car
loads of coal derailed.
y 338
Award No. 4
Page 2
Roadmaster Ough further testified that the claimant had been going
around the curve and squeezing up the joint ties, but he wasn't
raising the track or lining on the track; he was ,just going around
and each joint they'd tamp two, three or four ties. He testified
the tamping began at approximately MP110.20, and the claimant
tamped approximately half a mile around this curve from east to
west. He stated that to the best of his knowledge the derailment
occurred near MP 110.25.
Roadmaster Ough then testified that he had given the claimant the
CE Bulletin, CE 87-001-T, and also had talked to him and the rest _
of the section foremen of his territory about if they were tamping
to be sure to keep an eye on the temperature, and if it started
going up to place a slow order if .it was needed.
This witness also testified that if the rail temperature went
high enough and the ambient temperature was getting hot enough,
they needed to place a slow order gndmake_
surethey
had one on
if they needed it there, as per the instructions of the CE Bulletin.
Roadmaster Ough was asked to read the pertinent portion of the CE
Bulletin. That Bulletin reads as follows:
"Tie Gangs, Surfacing and Lining Gangs, pr Production
Track Liners Track that has been surfaced, lined or tied
must be restricted to a maximum of ten mph until 9:00
p.m. on the day the work is accomplished
if
the ambient -
temperature reaches or exceeds 80 degrees fahrenheit C85
degrees fahrenheit Southern Region)."
The Bulletin cited by the Roadmaster contains a great deal more
of instructions. Also on Page 9 of the Transcript Roadmaster
Ough cited_another portion of the CE Bulletin which he believed
to be relevant.
D. C. Griffin, Division Engineer, testified that on the date in
question he received a report of a derailment and proceeded to
Onaga. He stated that on the curve there at approximately MP 110
there were 18, 19 or 17, depending on who counted, but officially
they came up with 18 cars which were derailed out of an eastbound
coal train.
Division Engineer Griffin stated that from the pulse tape, the
train had been in the Duluth siding and came out of the Duluth
siding, down the grade, and was traveling approximately 30 mph
when it went into emergency.
This witness stated that the temperature was rather warm that
afternoon; local reports were that the temperature was between
90 and 94 degrees. He stated that he asked the claimant if he
understood the instructions regarding the placement of the slow
orders, and the claimant indicated he did.
L?
33 6
Award No. ·1
Page 3
Mr. Griffin further testified that the claimant advised him that,
heinf:,iointed rail around the curve, the work that he had done,
in his opinion, did not require the track to be slow.Qrdered,.
He stated that after talking to the claimant, he believed that
the claimant was well aware of the surfacing out-of-surfacing
requirements of the instructions because farther-on-west at
approximately the curve of MP 113
they had
tamped that and had
placed a ten mph order in accordance with the
current CE
Bulletin.
The evidence indicates that the claimant believed he was not working in continuous welded rail territory but was on bolted rail.
Testimony of record indicates that bolted rail in that territory
was to be treated as though they were CWR.
On the loregoinv basis the Board finds no justification to set the
C11Sriplino aide.
,1w AkD: Claim denied.
Preston .1. Moore, Chairman
Union Member
Carrier Member ,
v
Dated: November 10, 1'?8?