AWARD NO. 58 -
Case No. 58
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 4338
PARTIES) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
TO )
DISPUTE) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. The 30 day actual suspension assessed Laborer .F. Sanchez for .
alleged violation of various company rules as indicated by Mr.
M alone's letter of December 7, 1992 is arbitrary, capricious and
unwarranted.
2. The claimant's record shall be cleared of the discipline re--
ferred to in Part (1), and he shall be returned.to service and
reimbursed for all time lost.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 433_8 finds that the parties
herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board has jurisdiction.
In this dispute the claimant was notified to attend an investigation
in Rawlins, Wyoming on November 17, 1992 to develop the facts and
place responsibility, if any, in connection with his possible falsification of personal injury report he allegedly sustained on October
27, 1992 and submitted on November -3, 1992.
The claimant was also charged with his alleged failure to properly
report the alleged personal injury until November 2, 1992 which
indicated a possible violation of Safety, Radio andGeneral Rules for
All Employees, effective October 29, 1989.
Pursuant to the investigation the claimant was found guilty of failure to properly report the personal injury sustained on October 27,
1992 which he did not report until November 2, 1992. The claimant
was assessed thirty days actualsuspensioh.
At the outset of the hearing it was contended that the Notice of
Investigation dated November 9, 1-992 did not state precise charges._
The Board finds the charges set forth above are precise, and they
specifically charge the possible faisification
of
a personal injury
report, along with the claimant's alleged failure to properly report
the alleged personal injury until November 2, 1992. Those are the
only two charges which could be considered at the investigation.
R. L. Samuelson, Manager of Track Maintenance, testified that on
Monday, November 2, 1992 he received a call from the claimant sometime around 9:00 or 10:00 o'clock in the morning wherein he stated
he was in Laramie and was going to see a chiropractor. This- witness
-. ~f338
also testified the claimant advised him he had been having cramps
in hislegs. When the claimant was asked if he had sustained an
injury, he stated he did not know.
Mr. Samuelson further testified that he asked the claimant to call
him that evening,and when the claimant called that night at his
home, he advised that he went back to the chiropractor and they
thought he might have some back problems and were sending him for
an MRI scan. Mr. Samuelson testified the claimant again told him
he did not know if he had an injury.
Mr. Samuelson then testified that at this time he instructed the
claimant to come to his office the next morning since they needed
to fill out some paperwork on the injury. He testified that at
that time the claimant was not sure-,if lie had incurred an injury
or what kind of problem he had.
Mr. Samuelson also testified that he called Section Foreman Chuck
Sanchez and inquired regarding his knowledge of the situation and
was advised that the claimant had mentioned to him during the week
prior to that time that he was having a sore leg and he had fallen
down while elk hunting and thought he had hurt his leg. Mr. Samuelson further testified that Mr. Sanchez advised him that he had told
the claimant a couple of different times that week that he needed to
report the injury, but the claimant had failed to do so.
Mr. Samuelson testified the claimant filled out a personal injury
report stating that he incurred the injury while on duty handling
bags of rail anchors and that hydraulic power unit they were
tightening track bolts with, and that this would have been on October
27 when he incurred the injury.
Mr. Samuelson testified that he contacted the Section Foreman again
who stated they hadn't picked up any anchors on the 27th; they had
handled them the prior week.
Charles Sanchez, Jr., Section Foreman, testified that on Thursday,
October 29 the claimant told him: "I'm feelin.' a
lo(
better, don't
worry about it" and further stated "I fell down from when I was
huntin' over the weekend." Mr. Sanchez further testified that he
noticed the claimant was limping, and the claimant said it had
happened over the weekend.
Mr. Sanchez further testified that he advised the claimant that he
still needed to fill out an accident report and had advised the
claimant at least two or three times that he should fill out an
off-duty accident report. He also.testified the claimant never
told him anything about being hurt from anchors or anything like
that.
'._ Y33~
' - Award No. 58
Page 3
The claimant testified he did tell Foreman Charles Sanchez that he
fell whileout elk hunting, but he stated he wasn't sore from that.
The claimant also testified that on Tyesday, the 27th, he knew he
had a pain in his leg and he was limping quite a bit. He also
testified that Foreman Sanchez told him to fill out an off-duty
accident report.
The record establishes that the claimant was only found guilty of
failing to properly report an injury on October 27, 1992 and did
not confirm that he was injured until November 2, 1992 and did not
submit an injury report until November 3, 1992. The Carrier found
the claimant guilty of violation Rule 4004 of the Safety, Radio
and General Rules for All Employees, effective October 29, 1989.
The Board has carefully studied and considered allof the circumstances and the testimony of the claimant. Under the facts herein
there is no justification to set the discipline aside. The claimant
has 18 years of=service with the Carrier and should be well aware
that any injury should be reported as soon as possible. The
claimant's Section Foreman instructed him to do so, and he still
failed to report the injury. -
AWARD: Claim denied.
Preston
'T.
Moore, Chairman
U n Me ber
AD
d. VL
Z-\
Carrier Member