NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD
PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4370
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
AWARD N0. 2 -
Case No. 3
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
Claim of C. L. Smith, III, that he be returned
to service with. all seniority--and other rights
unimpaired and that he be compensated for
all
wage
loss suffered and that the charge be stricken from
his record.
F I N D I N C S Following an investigative hearing, the Claimant was dis-
missed from service for the "submission of a falsified personal
injury report which you performed [sic] on February 4, 1986 and
in which you alleged a muscle pull was sustained while
you
per
formed service at 11-:30
a.m.,
February 3, 1986". The Carrier
apparently reached its decision-bassed_,on-its conclusion as to
the improbability of an accident occurring_in the manner described
by the Claimant and on his supervisor's understanding of some .
deliberate misconduct by the Claimant., The supervisor testi
fied that two other employees had reported to him that the Claimant
PLB
No. 4370
Award
No. 2
Page
2
had told them, before the incident, that he was "going to get
hurt". The two employees supported their contentions through
written statements and testimony.
Following the alleged accident, the Claimant obtained medical treatment. When he reported to his supervisor, on or about
February 5, 1986, the supervisor advised him that he was "dis--qualified" from his position. The Claimant later provided a
medical note finding him fit for return to duty on February
27.
The Board first sees no basis for the "disqualification"
of the Claimant. If it were assumed that the Claimant was providing falseinformation about an alleged accident, the proper step
was for the Carrier to initiate disciplinary action (which it
did by notice of investigation dated March 10, 1986). Pending
such investigation and after the Claimant had medical evidence
that he was fit for duty, there was no basis for withholding
the Claimant from work.
The Carrier has a substantial burden to prove that the
Claimant's accident report was fabricated, despite allegations
by two other employees that they inferred from the Claimant's -
remarks that he was going to falsify an accident. Absent from
the record is any medical review by the Carrier as to examination
of the Claimant's alleged muscle strain. Such determination
cannot be made with any assurance by the supervisor or by laymen
PLB No. 4370
Award No. 2 -
Page 3
reviewing the hearing record. Convincing proof was lacking that
the events of February 3 did not occur as promptly reported by
the Claimant and as supported in medical-notes which he provided.
The claim will be sustained. Remuneration for wage loss
suffered, however, must take into account the medical evidence
of Claimant's incapacity until February--27, 1986. Pay for the
period thereafter must also be consonent with what his seniority
standing would have been had he not been "disqualified" on or -
about February 5, 1986.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the degree provided in the Findings.
The Carrier is directed to put this Award into,effect within
thirty (30)-days of the date of this Award.
1
HERBERT L. MARX, JR., Referee
NEW YORK, NY
DATED: June9,1988 -_