'~;i:ElVEI~-Gf.Pyv_?
LABOR RE:LA;T;t~,~.`-
JUL 1 5 91
NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 4370
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
AWARD NO. 27
Case No. 29
STATEMENT OF -CLAIM
1. The Carrier violated the provisions of the
current Agreement when it improperly removed Mr.
P. Ramirez' Foreman and Assistant Foreman's
seniority when Claimant's actions were based on the
instructions Claimant received from the Carrier's
officers.--
2. The Carrier shall now be required to restore
Claimant's seniority
in
the classes of Foreman and _
Assistant Foreman and compensate Claimant for any wage
loss suffered as a result of the above referred to
violation.
F I N D I N G S
The Claimant established seniority as
a
Trackman
effective with his hiring date of June 26, 1978. On July
27, 1981, he acquired seniority as an Assistant Foreman and
Track Foreman. On December 15, 1989, while working as Track- -
man, he was placed on force reduction and subsequently bumped
into a Trackman's position commencing December 27, 1989.
PLB No. 4370
Award No. 27
Page 2
As of January 1, 1990, Surfacing Gang SC-11 was being
formed at Fort Worth. Pending completion of the bulletining
period, an employee junior in Foreman seniority to the Claimant was placed in the SC-11 Foreman position. When the roadmaster realized his error, he notified the Claimant that he
was to fill the Foreman position on Surfacing Gang SC-11 as
of January 4. The Claimant refused the placement, moving
to another Foreman's position instead. Upon these events,
the Carrier then determined that the Claimant had forfeited
his Foreman seniority by failure to report
as
drectedfor
the SC-11 Foreman position.
The Carrier relies on Rules 12 (g).and 14-as the basis.
for its determination. These Rules read in pertinent part
as follows:
Rule 12:
Temporary Assignment (g): New positions and
vacancies undergoing bulletining and assignment,
also temporary vacancies of less than thirty (30)
calendar days duration which are to be filled, shall
be assigned in the following order:
1. To the senior unassigned employe ofthe
class whether'working in a lower class or furloughed-account force reduction.
2. To the senior employe awaiting promotion
in accordance with the provisions of Rule 10.
3. By promotion of- the seni_pr employe in the
next lower class or classes in accordance with the
provisions- of Rule 10.
PLB No. 4370
Award
No.
27
Page
3
Rule 14 - Recall
When forces are
occur, employes who
reduction or forced
shall be recalled
their seniority.
Recall
to Service
e increased, or vacancies
o have been cut off
in
force
d to displace in a lower class,
to service in the order of
Off in force reduction employes shall be
notWied of their recall to service by personal
contact or in writing at their last_a3diess-of
record and must report for service within fifteen
(15) calendar days from the date
notice
of recall -
is received.
Employes failing to respond to recall to service
under the provisions of this rule shall-forfeit their
seniorz-t.y in the class to .which recalled.
Positions may be filled temporarily pending the
return to service of arecalled,employe
by
the nearest
qualified employe holding seniority rights in the
class available without delay to-the work.
The Board finder that the Carrier has.properly applied
Rule 12 (g) in this instance. The SC-11 Foreman position
was a temporary assignment, as defined by Rule-12 (g). The
Claimant was "the senior
class . . .
days he was
Rule
unassigned employe of the [Foreman]
a lower class", although for several
not recognized
14, on which the Carrier also relies, concerns
working in
mistakenly
as such.
principally "recall to service" of--employees cut off in force
reduction, but it also coyers_.,employees "forced to displace
in a lower class". The Claimant had been "forced to displace"
on December 15, although he displaced from one Trackman position
PLB No. 4370
Award No. 27
Page 4
to another.
Whether the
forfeiture of seniority referred,
to in Rule 14 is applicable in this situation
,is
open to
question.
Suffice it to say that the Claimant improperly refused -
to comply with the placement on January 4, 1990, as required,
by Rule 12 (g).- Adverse consequences to his status thereafter are of his own responsibility. Given all the circumstances herein, however, the Board finds that permanent loss
of seniority rights is not warranted. The Award will provide
that the Claimant's seniority rights as Foreman and Assistant
Foreman be restored- to.their original date. There is, however,
no basis for the granting of back pay.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the- extent ,provided in.the Findings.
The Carrier
is
directed to put this Award into effect within
thirty (30) days of the date of this Award.
G~
HERBERT L. MARX, JR., Chairman and Neutral Member
C. F. DOSE, Employee Member
R. S NEIDER, Carrier Member
NEW YORK, NY
DATED: