Parties
to the
Dispute
PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4431
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
VS.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OE CLAIM
Claim of Machine Operator H. J. Venstad for all
time lost as a result of ten-day suspension and
removal of discipline marls from his personal
record.
FINDINGS
Claimant H. J. Venstad was assigned as a Machine Operator. On
October 3, 1986, he was operating a Galion Crane when it tipped over
while he was performing a fob with it. As a result, Claimant was charged
and an investigation was held. Following the investigation, Claimant
was found guilty of a violation of Rule 931 of the Rules of the Maintenance of Way Department and assessed a ten-day suspension.
The Organization protested the ten-day suspension and processed
the claim to the highest designated Carrier Officer. The claim was
denied on March 16, 1987, by Carrier's highest designated Officer to
L!L(31-15
hand grievances. Petitioner listed this case before the Board on January
8, 1988.
Carrier argues that Petitioner did not meet the time limit con-
tained in Schedule Agreement Rule 42(c) for progressing claims to a
q __,- BI.X.
Board. That rule states that ~ monthsis allowed to progress a claim
to the Board or it will be barred.
The Board has reviewed the case from this perspective and we
are forced to conclude that the Petitioner was late in progressing
the claim to the Board. As such, we are forced to dismiss it.
AWARD
The claim is dismissed.
R: E. Dennis, Neutral er
B. . Clover, Employe Member
ice--.
M. Timberman, Carrier Member
~ -lv-
~'%
Dite of Adoption