PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4431
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES:
Parties
to the 
VS. 
Case No. 9
Dispute
 
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1. The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
improperly withheld Section Foreman M. Mattson from
service beginning July 1, 1986.
2. Claimant M. Mattson shall be returned to service and
he shall be allowed
... 
all straight time and overtime hours
worked by Section Foreman or Track Inspector
that Claimant Mattson may have exercised
Seniority over due to displacement of his
permanent position as Section Foreman, also
claimed are all health and welfare benefits
(sic), vacation, personal leave days and
Railroad Retirement (sic) credits.
OPINION OF THE BOARD
Claimant M.B. Mattson was employed by Carrier as a
Foreman at the time of the incident that prompted this case.On April 11, 1984, Claimant suffered an on-duty injury
to his lower back. He was out of work for about five
months. On September 4, 1984, Claimant was returned to 
his
Foreman position with instructions from his doctor that he
2 
yy3t-9
could not lift more than 20 pounds and then only
occasionally. Claimant worked this job until August 1,
1985, when he was granted a leave of absence to have back
surgery.
Surgery was performed on September 5, 1985, and on
June 9, 1986, Claimant's physician released him for work as
a Foreman, effective July 1, 1986. Claimant's doctor stated
at this time that Claimant could not lift over 20 or 30
pounds on an occasional basis and he could not perform work
that required twisting and bending of the lower back.
Carrier refused to return Claimant to duty on the basis
that there was no job in the Maintenance of Way Department
with such restrictions. It stated that Foremen were not
just Supervisors who stood and watched, but were working
Foremen and often were required to push and haul heavy
materials to help the men with a heavy task. Petitioner
objected to Carrier's description of a Foreman's duties.
It argued that the Agreement describes a Foreman as follows:
B. Foreman
An employe assigned to direct the work
of men and reporting to officials of. the
railroad shall be classified as a foreman.
Petitioner concluded that, based on that description,
an employe working as a Foreman did not have to lift heavy
qq 3(- 9
s
items and Claimant could clearly perform the required
duties.
Carrier argued, however, that the statement in the
Agreement was not a job description that outlined the
Foreman's complete duties. It submitted a job description
to the Claimant's doctor for review. It then requested the
doctor to reevaluate and state if Claimant was physically
capable of performing the duties outlined. The doctor did
not affirm that Claimant could perform the duties as
outlined in the job description. The pertinent part of a
Track Foreman's and a Track Inspector's job description
reads as follows:
TRACK FOREMAN
Foreman directs the work of his assigned crew
and performs and assists in all tasks associated
with the installation of new track and the
maintenance of existing track. It is an
extremely strenuous job that can require constant
physical and manual effort.
Most of the work is manual labor assisted by
power equipment where available. A foreman may
be required to assist in manually loading or
unloading material kegs (200lbs. or more),
crossties (250 lbs. or more) and rails (1,820
lbs. or more), which are needed for the job.
To secure the rail to the ties, foremen and
trackmen drive spikes and anchors with mauls
(6 or 8 lbs.).
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS:
Overall Strength Job can beclassified
 
as very heavy work.
 
Requires occasional
 
lifting and carrying
 
of heavy loads as
 
described above.
Ll X13 I -q
Coordination Balance required
 
while assisting in the
 
loading and unloading
 
of materials and
 
distributing ballast
 
from moving cars.
 
Constantly stoops and
 
kneels while spot
 
raising track and to
 
check surface of track.
Range of Motion Bending over rail to
 
raise track, reaching
 
required to give hand
 
signals or directions
 
while aligning track,
 
etc. Some twisting
 
and stooping required
 
as part of job.
TRACK INSPECTOR
Track Inspector is an employee assigned the
responsibility for the proper inspection of
tracks, roadway and the right-of-way on his
district(s). He must meet all requirements
of the position per FRA Rule 213.7.
Inspection must be made on foot and/or by riding
over the track in a vehicle at a speed that
allows the person making the inspection to
visually inspect the track structure for
compliance with BN Standards. He must be able
to make corrections to deviations found or
prescribe appropriate remedial action to
correct or safely compensate for those
deviations.
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS:
Overall Strength Job can be classified
 
as hard work. Requires
 
setting hi-rail on
 
track each day which
 
can amount to 100 lbs.
 
lifting pressure on
 
hi-rail assembly gear.
yq31-9
5
Must be able to lift
angle bars from
ground to 
vehicle and
vehicle to ground
(75 lbs. or more).
Must be able to use
a track wrench to
tighten track bolts,
switch braces, etc.
Coordination Balance required
 
while loading or
 
unloading tools and
 
angle bars. Must
 
be able to handle
 
switch stands to
 
make reverse throws,
 
checking switch
 
points for proper
 
gap, ease of movement,
 
etc.
Range of Motion Variety of motions
 
required 
such 
as;
 
setting hi-rail vehicle
 
on or off track,
 
lining switches to
 
check proper throws
 
and fits which is a
 
twisting motion,
 
stooping or banding
 
over the rail to
 
check surface and
 
alignment of track,
 
bridge ends and
 
switches.
This Board has reviewed the aosition of each side and
it concludes that the job.description submitted by Carrier
far more realistically describes what a Track Foreman
does than the description of a Foreman contained in 
Rule
55 (B).
Given this conclusion, are are compelled to decide that
 
.. 
, r. 
N 
t 
f 3I -9
Carrier need not return Claimant to work until it is
satisfied that Claimant can properly perform his duties
without threat of injury to himself or to others working
around him. This Board can find no basis in the record for
directing Carrier to return Claimant to work at this time.
AWARD
The claim is denied.
 
r.Jw!f
RDennis, Neutral Member
tuce Glover, Employe Member Maxine Timberman, Carrier Member
Date  Approval