PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO: 4450
AWARD NO. 56
NMB CASE NO. 56
PARTIES TO THE DISPUTE:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
(Western Region-Feather River)
- and -
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
STATEMENT OF
CLAIM: Claim of Engineer A. J. Bakker, timeslip
#p--13 dated August 7, 1993 for 122 miles not allowed to tie-up
for undisturbed rest (UDR).
OPINION OF
BOARD: In August 1993, Engineer A. J. Bakker
(Claimant) was working pool freight service between La Grande and
Hinkle, Oregon with the Home terminal of La Grande. On August 7,
1993 Claimant was called to GLNPHS/02 on duty at LaGrande at 0235
and tieing up at Hinkle at 1329. Approximately eleven (11) hours
later, Claimant was called on duty at 2142 to deadhead from
Hinkle to LaGrande, arriving at 2330. The deadhead from Hinkle,
Oregon (the away-from-home terminal) to LaGrande, Oregon (the
home terminal) was a total of 105 miles consuming a total time of
two (2) hours.
Upon arrival at La Grande Claimant reviewed his board
standing and found he was three times out. He called CMS and
attempted to lay-off undisturbed rest (UDR) for a eight (8) hour
period. Therefore, following that two (2) hour deadhead,
IaL6 wD.v4'sv
2
Claimant requested eight (8) hours undisturbed rest at his home
terminal. The CMS Shift Manager would not allow Claimant to tieup UDR and refused to guarantee Claimant the eight (8) hours UDR.
Claimant was called 11 hours 25 minutes later for Carrier's
GLCOVC02 train.
Subsequent to the denial of the undisturbed rest, a
claim was filed as quoted in employe's statement of claim,
indicating a violation of Rule 103 of the Schedule Agreement
between the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the Brotherhood of
Locomotive Engineers, as follows:
REST PERIODS
"(a) When engineers claim needed rest, they shall so
specify on the Federal register and they shall not be
disturbed during such rest period.
(b) In the application of Section(a) of this rule, an
engineer may request a rest period of eight (8) hours
if he has been on duty less than sixteen (16)
continuous hours or ten (10) hours if he has been on
duty sixteen hours continuously by so indicating on the
register at time relieved from duty.
' . PL
a
Pa . q
Y&-o
AcalO ·'
3
(c) Where an "undisturbed" rest period is requested
and so specified on the Federal register under the
conditions prescribed in Section (b) hereof, the crew
calling forces will not contact the engineer for a call
-- either to deadhead or to perform service -- during
the rest period.
Note 1: The provisions of Section (a), (b)
and (c) of this rule shall apply at home
terminals, away-from-home terminals and at
tie-up points for engineers in road freight
service and at home terminal for engineers in
yard and helper service.
Note 2: Under no circumstances may an
engineer request a rest period in excess of
eight or ten hours where and when applicable
in the applications of Sections (a) and (b)
of this rule.
Note 3: Where an engineer requests an
'undisturbed' rest period of eight (8) or ten
(10) hours pursuant to Sections (a) and (b)
ICY-g
,vo - 1lY6D
A &.40 AD - 66
,
4
of this rule and, except for such action, he
would have stood for service at an earlier
time or he would have been used in service or
deadheaded except for such action, the
engineer so involved shall have no basis for
a penalty claim against the Company account
not being called in turn or used in service
or deadheaded for service, etc.
Note 4: The provisions of Sections (a) and
(b) of this rule shall not apply unless
engineers clearly make notation of Federal
register that they are requesting
'undisturbed' rest and for failure to make
such a notation, the engineer affected may be
called and used in accordance with other
applicable rules of this agreement.
Example: Engineer 'A' requests eight hours
of 'undisturbed' rest, from tie up time of
7:40 a.m. Under this rule an engineer
requesting eight hours of 'undisturbed' rest
will not be called to perform service or to
~La .t'o . NY6L
~d,,_a
No . 5~
s
deadhead until 3:40 p.m."
The principles which govern disposition of this claim have
been set forth in detail in Awards 1 and 2 of PLB 3623, UPIBLE
(Referee D. Eischen). Although the rule language in the
Divisional Agreement involved in those cases was slightly
different, the same fundamental concepts apply here, i.e., the
UDR Rule never was intended to allow an Engineer to tie up for
rest on every trip , the BLE and responsible engineers understand
that UDR is to be used with restraint and only when rest really
was necessary, and "penalty" payments should not be allowed for
insubstantial, technical or de minimis failures to provide
properly requested UDR. Within those parameters, the Engineer
has a contractual entitlement to request and receive UDR, without
second-guessing by CMS.
Each such case must turn upon its own individual set of
facts. Applying the above-described principles to the facts of
this record, we conclude that this claim must be sustained.
'Claimant's two hour deadhead did constitute being "on duty less
than sixteen (16) hours", he had made 2 rountrips in 2 days, he
stood third out for a third trip with the possibility of being
called again in six or seven hours and he made a proper request
for UDR. This fact pattern might well be seen as "pushing the
envelope" of the agreed upon interpretation and application of
p',./3 ,vo,
qV
AVi) NJ.
-6-&
Rule 103 to outer limits, but we are not persuaded that Claimant
abused his privilege under the Rule or frivolously invoked UDR in
these circumstances. As it turned out, CMS could have and should
have granted his request and the failure to do so was a violation
of Rule 103 for which exemplary damages must be awarded.
AWARD
Claim sustained
Dana Edward cHeniarrnn
Dated at Ithaca, New York on September 13, 1995
Union Member
Company Member