BEFORE PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4633
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
and
INDIANA HARBOR BELT RAILROAD COMPANY
Case
No.
3
Dispute: Claim of the Brotherhood:
(1) The ten days of suspension imposed upon Trackman P.
Alvarado for allegedly passing by C.P. Rose on Track
No. 1
while operating track car A-30034 to Franklin
Avenue without authority from the Carrier dispatcher on
December 26, 1986, was without just and sufficient cause
and on the basis of unproven charges;
(2) The Claimant shall have his record cleared of the charge
leveleq against him and he shall be compensated for all
wage loss suffered.
Findings:
Claimant P. Alvarado is employed by Carrier as a trackman. On
December 28, 1986, the Claimant received a letter instructing him to
appear for an investigation in connection with a charge reading:
issuance of CT-401 from K.W. O'Brien to you at Argo Tower at
approximately 8:17 a.m., December 26, 1986, on passing by
C.P. Rose on Track #1 in a westerly direction while operating
track car A-30034 to Franklin Avenue without authority from the
IHB Dispatcher.
The investigation was held on February 11, 1987, and as a result,
Claimant was assessed ten working days of suspension. The organization
thereafter filed a claim on Claimant's behalf, -challenging his
suspension.
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony
in
this case
and we find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support
the finding that the Claimant was guilty of failing to comply with the
Carrier's rules that pertain to obtaining permission to occupy the No.
1 main track. Therefore, he did occupy that track between C.P. Rose
PL$ -V033-S
and Franklin Avenue without proper.authority.
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence
in the record to support the guilty finding, we next turn our
attention to the type of discipline imposed. This Board will not set
aside a carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find its action
to have been unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious.
In the case at hand the Claimant had been employed by the Carrier
for approximately thirteen years. Although his action was a violation
of the rules, this Board finds that the ten day suspension was
excessive and much too severe given the nature of the wrongdoing and
the length of service of the Claimant. Therefore, we hereby reduce.
the suspension to a five day suspension and order that the Claimant be
paid the other five days and that his personnel record be adjusted to
reflect a five day suspension.
AWARD
Claim sustained in part. The ten day suspension is hereby
reduced to a five day suspension. The Claimant is to be made whole
for the additional five days and his personnel record is to be amended
to reflect a five day sus sion instead of a ten day suspension.
~~
YYl1
Neutral emb
Carrier Member.,// Organization Member
Date:
~~7
d
2