PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 4768
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
and
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
AWARD NO. 71
Carrier File No. 7MWA 92-6-25
organization File No. C-92-C100-29
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1. The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
assigned outside forces to perform work constructing an
extension of main double track (dirt work, culvert
extensions, construction of two railroad bridges) between
Walker and Bill, Wyoming beginning on January 12, 1992
and
continuing.
2. As a consequence of the aforestated violation:
(a) Machine Operators S. L. Scholfeld, R. W. Hetherington, B. D. Hirchert, K. P. Wittmus, T. L. Jackson, J.
W. Cornell, R. L. Neverve, J. G. Long, J. W. Bates, T. E.
Dowell, C. R. Kelly, A.
D.
Anderson and
D.
L. McKeon
shall each be allowed pay at their respective straight
time and overtime rates, for an equal proportionate share
of the total man-hours (straight-time and overtime)
consumed by the outside forces performing the.machine
operator work involved in the dirt work project referred
to in Part (1) hereof, beginning on January 12, 1992 and
continuing. (b) Messrs. S. L. Talbot, K. N. Wright, M.
C. Rose, R. R. Martinez,
D.
L. Johnson, S. T. Bennett, B.
N. Welte, S. L. Bickford, C. E. Bluye, D. J. Ashmore, L.
D. Welte, J. R. Branson, R. G. Seegrist, C. J. Welte,
Jr., T. W. Lewis and B. D. Deuel shall each be allowed
pay at their respective straight time and overtime rates,
for an equal proportionate share of total man-hours
(straight time and overtime) consumed by the outside
forces performing the Bridge and Building Subdepartment
work involved in the bridge and culvert
extension work
referred to in Part (1) hereof beginning on January.12,
1992 and continuing.
The Carrier notified the General chairman as follows:
As information, the carrier intends to construct a
new second main track between the existing sidings of
Walker and Bill on joint-line trackage in Wyoming .... it is
intended that bids be invited for the general contracting
of this work about Oct. 7, 1991, awarding a general
contract to cover work including grading, constructing of
a new bridge over State Highway 59 and a,new'bridge over
County Road 32, constructing of new track, and related
items, no later than Nov. 15, 1991 in order to expedite
bridge construction for completion no later than July 31,
1992. Construction of subgrade, including subballast, is
to be completed ready for tracklaying by July 3, 1992.
The length of the project is approximately 9.2 miles.
Projects of this magnitude have been customarily
performed by outside contract forces. The Company possesses neither the specialized equipment nor the special
skills required, nor is the Company adequately equipped
to handle the work and to complete the new construction
within the allotted time period.
Following conferences on the matter, the Carrier proceeded
with the contracting of the project, resulting in the claim before
the Board.
As emphasized by the Carrier, the Board reviewed a similar
major new track construction project in Award 14. That Award
concerned the relocation of seven miles of track. Award 14, making
reference to the Note to Rule 55, stated in pertinent part
as
follows:
The Organization points out various aspects of .the
work which might be accomplished by Carrier forces
through the use of Carrier equipment or--equipment which
might be rented for the purpose. Nevertheless, this is
not sufficient to defeat the Carriers contentions that
the major track location project did involve .!!special
skills".(as to certain of-the equipment, in.particular).
and "special equipment not owned" by the Carrier. . .
Thus, the Organization has not established that
projects such as involved here are "customarily
performed" by Carrier forces. In sum, the
organization has not provided convincing proof as to the
inapplicability of those circumstances provided
in
the
Note to Rule 55 under which such work "may be let to
contractors and be performed by contractors' forces".
In this instance, the organization has provided additional
evidence in support of its view that work of this nature can and
should be performed by Carrier forces. After full review, the
Board nevertheless determines that this major new track
construction project comports with the conclusion, quoted above,
reached in Award 14. There is no convincing basis for the Board
to determine otherwise in this instance.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
HERBERT MARX, Jr, Chairman and Neu Member
MARK J.-SC PAUGH, E ogee ember
·r°
D.MERRELL, Carrier Member
NEW YORK, NY
DATED: ` Ol
6
~9~
- 3 -