NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 4979
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
AWARD NO. 10
Case No. 10
Carrier File No. BMWE-D-130
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
(a) Carrier's dismissal of Claimant Kevin Cross
was without just and sufficient cause, was not based
on any clear and probative evidence and was done in
an arbitrary and capricious manner, wholly beyond
the Scope of the Scheduled Agreement.
(b) Claimant Cross shall be reinstated into
Carrier's service with al-1 seniority entitlements and
shall be compensated for all lost wages, including
overtime benefits which would accrue to him, as
provided for in Rule "K" of the Scheduled Agreement.
F I N D I N G .S
The Claimant, a Truck Driver with three years' service,
was subject to an investigative hearing under the following
charge:
CHARGE ONE: Alleged Violation of Rule K of the
NRPC Rules of Conduct which reads in part, "Theft,
misappropriation, or use for personal gain of Amtrak
PLB No. 4979
Award No. 10
Page 2
funds, property or services is prohibited. Employees must use Amtrak funds, property or services
with care and economy and protect them from theft
or abuse".
In that you used a company vehicle Swivel Dump
Truck TG94859-T66401, Mass. Registration #T-750 for
your personal use on March 27 and 29, 1990 and on April
2, 1990.
Also in that on March 29, 1990 at your father-in
law's residence at 144 High Street in Danvers you were
observed dumping crushed stone owned by Amtrak from
a company vehicle Swivel Dump Truck TG94859, T66401,
Mass. Registration #T-950 without authorization. Also
in that you are in unauthorized possession of used
MBTA railroad ties at your father-in-law's residence
at 144 High Street in Danvers.
Following the hearing, the Carrier
guilty, and the Claimant was dismissed
During the course of the hearing,
that he had taken a Carrier truck to his
residence (near his own residence) where
found the Claimant
from service.
the Claimant admitted
father-in-law's
it had remained over-
night on three occasions, without permission from or knowledge
of the Carrier.
At this property, there was found 25 railroad ties, convincingly identified as belonging to the MBTA, for which the
Carrier acts as contractor
ant's explanation as to the
unconvincing to the Carrier.
to the conclusion that the
in certain
presence
Among
Claimant
n functions. The Claim-
of the ties was entirely
other factors leading
had misappropriated the
PLB No. 4979
Award No. 10
Page 3
ties was his production of an alleged "receipt", containing
information clearly not matching the ties in question.
As to the allegations concerning crushed stone, the
Claimant admitted "sweeping out" some remaining stone from
the truck, a highly improbable explanation for the presence
of a quantity of stone matching that which the Claimant had
in fact transported for Carrier purposes in the course of
his work.
The Board notes that the Organization correctly states
that there was no direct observation of the Claimant's placement of the ties and stone in his father-in-law's yard. However, the explanations given by the Claimant as to how the
items were obtained other than by being misappropriated from
the Carrier were contradictory' and evasive.
The Board has reviewed the record and finds that the
Carrier had ample justification for its conclusion concerning
the ties and probably the stone. As to the unauthorized use
of the truck, this was fully admitted by the Claimant. The
charge against the Claimant is a gravely serious one and is
not of the type properly subject to corrective disciplinary
measures. As a result, the Board finds no basis to disturb
the dismissal action taken by the Carrier.
. c
PLB No. 4979
Award No. 10
Page 4
A W A R D
Claim denied.
1 ~ ~, i1 r
HERBERT L. MARX, JR., Chairman and Neutral Member
B. A. WINTER, Employee Member
S
v
P. A. ENGLE, Carrier Member
NEW YORK, NY
DATED: