PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 5210
Case No. 3
Award No. 3
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
-and-
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION
QUESTION AT ISSUE:
Under the terms of the Agreement, is the Carrier constrained
to utilize covered members to perform pilot work on selfpropelled vehicles such as the Burro Crane, Tamper and Snow
Blower?
FINDINGS:
This Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence,
finds as follows:
That the parties were given due notice of the hearing:
That the Carrier and Employees involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934:
That this Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
The Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (hereinafter
referred to as PATH or the Carrier) is a short, turn-around,
electric passenger railway that is wholly-owned by The Port
Authority of New York and New Jersey. The Brotherhood of
Locomotive Engineers (hereinafter referred to as the Organization
or the BLE) represents approximately 170 employees in the titles
of Engineer, Engineer-Switching and Yard Supervisor.
In 1966, PATH purchased its first self-propelled vehicle,
the Burro Crane. On October 27, 1966, as part of a new collective
bargaining agreement, the parties agreed how the Burro Crane
would be brought to, from or within a work site. That agreement
provided, in pertinent part, as follows:
1
(q) Article XVII of the basic agreement is
amended by adding thereto a new paragraph, to
be called Paragraph G (which shall follow
Paragraph F). Paragraph G shall read as
follows:
"G. The following rule shall govern
the manning of Burro Crane No. BC-1
and any replacement therefor (sic)
(hereinafter "the Burro Crane")
which may hereafter be operated by
PATH.
The Burro Crane may be coupled to, or
be the motive power of, a work train and
be brought to or from a work site by the
Motorman assigned to the work train. It
will be coupled or uncoupled by a MotorSwitchman, except that at points where
there is no Motor-Switchman on duty the
Motorman on the work train may be
required to perform this work from his
cab, or it may be performed by an
employee not covered by this agreement.
The Burro Crane may be moved from
one point to another within a work site,
without a Motorman, p.-ovided it does not
pass through Interlocking Signals
(unless in an area protected by a Train
-Order) and stays within the working
- --- limits provided for in a Train Order.
It is recognized that there is a
dispute pending between PATH and the
Brotherhood concerning the necessity of
manning self-propelled equipment moved
on rails. This rule concerning the
operation of the Burro Crane is made
without prejudice to the position of
-- either party to this dispute (but shall
_. govern the operation of Burro Crane No.
BC-1 and any replacement therefor)
(sic), and shall not be construed so as
to prejudice the position of either said
party therein."
In 1968, PATH purchased a Tamper and a Snow Blower and
entered into a letter agreement with the Organization setting
forth how this equipment would be staffed. That letter agreement
provided as follows:
2
52io-3
It is proposed that Article XVII of the
agreement between us dated August 24, 1967 be
amended by adding thereto a new paragraph to
be called Paragraph F. Paragraph F shall read
as follows:
'IF. The following rule shall govern the
manning of Tamper No. T-1 and Snow Blower No.
SB-1 while operating independently, or any
replacements therefor (sic) so operating.
For the purposes of this rule, the word
'pilot' shall mean an employee qualified as a
Motorman (and paid the Motorman's rate of pay
while acting as a pilot) who accompanies the
operator of the Tamper or Snow Blower and
directs him with respect to movements on
rails of the unit involved.
The Tamper may be moved from one point to
another within a work site, without a pilot,
provided it does not pass through
Interlocking Signals (unless in an area
protected by a Train order) and stays within
the working limits provided for in a Train
Order. Notwithstanding Article VI-A of this
agreement, a Motor-Switchman may be assigned
to pilot the Tamper to or from a work site.
However, a Motor-Switchman so assigned will
be paid at the Motorman's rate of pay for the
entire-day, including the time spent in his
Yegular.tour both before and after piloting
the Tamper. The Terminal or Yard that sends a
Motor-Switchman to pilot the Tamper to a work
site shall send the senior available
qualified Motor-Switchman.
The Snow Blower may be moved for storage,
shopping, etc. etc., without a pilot,
provided it does not pass through
Interlocking Signals (unless in an area
protected by a Train Order) and stays with
the limits provided for in a Train Order ....
It is recognized that there is a dispute
pending between PATH and the Brotherhood
concerning the necessity of manning selfpropelled equipment moved on rails. This rule
concerning the operation of the Tamper and
Snow Blower is made without prejudice to the
position of either party to his dispute (but
shall govern the operation of Tamper No. T-1,
3
5a(o-3
Snow Blower No. SB-1 and any replacements
therefor),(sic) and shall not be construed so
as to prejudice the position of either party
herein."
Since 1966, the Burro Crane has always been operated by a
locomotive engineer. And since 1968, a locomotive engineer has
always piloted both the Tamper and the Snow Blower. The
aforementioned agreements have remained essentially unchanged to
the present time although the title of "Motorman" has been
changed to "Engineer" in the present Agreement between the
parties and the title of "Motor-Switchman" has been changed to
"Engineer/Switching.', Also, the pilot assigned to the Tamper and
Snow Blower works a maximum of
six
(6) hours rather than the
eight (8) hour maximum allowed by the 1966 and 1968 agreements.
Other than these alterations those agreements have not changed in
any material respect.
On May 3, 1994, PATH wrote to the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) and inquired if it was permissible for it to
use Maintenance Equipment Operators on self-propelled on-rail
equipment such as burro cranes, tampers and snow blowers without
a locomotive engineer being assigned to such equipment. On May
16, 1994, the FRA responded that Maintenance Equipment Operators
could operate this equipment without a locomotive engineer also
being assigned provided this is consistent with PATH operating
rules. The Carrier subseq_ently submitted the aforementioned
Ouestion at issue to this Board.
As,-noted above, since the late 1960's locomotive engineers
have been given the contracuuaf right to staff or pilot Burro
Cranes, Tampers and Snow Blowers on PATH when such equipment is
operated outside the worksite, shop or storage area. Moreover,
the current Agreement between the parties requires pilots on the
Tamper and Snow Blower to be qualified as Engineers. These
contractual obligations are mandatory, not permissive.
Accordingly, PATH may not unilaterally remove Engineers or
Engineers/Switching from this equipment.
The FRA's response to the question posed to it by the
Carrier cannot alter the clear contractual requirement on PATH
mandating that Burro Cranes, Tampers and Snow Blowers be operated
or piloted by locomotive engineers. It is the collective
bargaining Agreement that is controlling in this dispute, not FRA
regulations. In accordance with the current Agreement, qualified
Engineers must staff or pilot Burros Cranes, Tampers and Snow
Blowers on PATH when such equipment is operated outside the
worksite, storage area or shop. Any changes to this Agreement
must be negotiated pursuant to Section 6 of the Railway Labor
Act, notwithstanding the opinion expressed by the FRA in their
May 16, 1994, response to PATH.
4
6-al o -3
MTSWER
Under the terms of the Agreement, the Carrier is constrained
to utilize covered members to perform pilot work on selfpropelled vehicles such as the Burro Crane, Tamper and Snow
Blower.
Robert M. O'Brien, Neutral Member
seph A.,Cassidy~ tion Member
Carmelo Gianino, Carrier Member
Dated:
5