PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 53$3

BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS )
VS. ) Parties to Dispute
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLATM:






Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that the Board is duly constituted by agreement and has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.
Claimant worked a one-man hostler relay assignment at Proviso on August 31, 1992. On that date he was instructed to take an engine from the Diesel Ramp to the Hump Yard and while doing so was


involved in a collision with another unit fouling the route. This accident caused damages of about one Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars to the locomotives.
Following a disciplinary investigation, Claimant was found at fault and disciplined with five (5).days actual suspension.
The Board has reviewed the record in this case and we conclude that the claim should be allowed. Claimant moved the engine by himself, with no ground crew, and with the long hood forward which restricted his vision. The transcript indicates that the supervision was aware of what was occurring and allowed an unsafe movement to proceed. In this circumstance it is unfair to pin the matter entirely on Claimant.

                          AWARD


      Claim is sustained.


                          ORDER

The Carrier is ordered to make this Award effective within thirty (30) days from the date shown below.

~rr,ployee Member Carri Member

                  zq?/&

                  Chairman nd Neut al Member


Dated: ~o~ '-~ - % 7