bRGTriEFEOGD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
)
VS. ) Parties to Dispute
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY )
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: _-






Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that the Board is duly constituted by agreement end has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter. Claimant was assessed ten (10) days suspension for failing an efficiency test. This suspension activated thirty (30) and ten (10) days deferred suspensions from previous disciplinary incidents, resulting in a total of fifty (50) days being served. The claim seeks payment for the entire suspension period.
                                            pt.,g x'o .5.39-? ArN O N a ~ L(8


The operative facts are that the head end and several cars of Claimant's train passed a point where two (2) supervisors were waiting, after which one (1) of them lit a fuses to see if the head end crew was observant of the cars behind as the train when through curved track. The head end did not acknowledge the fusee which was the basis for the disciplinary action against the crew.
The Board has carefully studied the record in this case and we conclude that the claim should be sustained because there was insufficient time between the initial visibility of the lighted fusee and the point where it could no longer be seen by the Engineer looking in a reverse direction. Taking into account the speed of the train (@ 50 mph) there was only a small window of opportunity. Had the fuses been lit sooner than it was,a different result might have obtained.

                          AWARD


      Claim is sustained.


                          ORDER

The Carrier is ordered to make this Award effective within thirty (30) days from the date shown below.

            ~ /17. Y~ 7


Employee Member Car _er Me '_r

                Chairman anV Neutral Member


Dated: ~-. S -~
-2-