BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS )
VS. ) Parties to Dispute
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY )
,SZ&T&flNT OF CLAIM:



'Your responsibility for your failure to properly perform your duties, when you filed to take your meal period using the bracket on November 28, 1994 while employed as Conductor of YPR88 on duty. 8:00 a.m. November 28, 2994 at Irondale.'" FI2~IIIGS Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that the Board is duly constituted by agreement and has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter. Claimant Conductor was found responsible for not taking meal period within the bracket while operating a yard assignment. He was disciplined with five (5) days suspension.


The E_-nployees contend the claim should be allowed under an application of a time limits provision reading in part as follows:

          "Within five days thereafter an investigation shall be held and a decision shall be rendered and made effective within three days after the investigation."

The record here shows that the investigation was held on November 30, 1994, and the decision was rendered on December 7, 1994. There is no showing that an extension of time was agreed to by the parties. Accordingly the claim must be allowed regardless of merit. Numerous awards hold similarly.

      Claim is sustained.


                          ORDER

The Carrier is ordered to make this Award effective within thirty (30) days from the date shown below.

Employee Member Carr~r Membe

                  1~.C~mv

                  Chairman an Neutral Member


Dated: