BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS )
VS. ) Parties to Dispute
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY )

STATENI= OF CIA=:












Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board
finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within
r_ r., ;nR cl o., 1._
                                                          .'


                                            - - _ _. ' J


                                          v:


                                          zr. _ . . G

yLG via - 53,f?

,4,,, o .uj - 5-& 7


the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that the Board is duly constituted by agreement and has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.
Claimant Engineer was found responsible for failure to properly perform his duties and with delay to his train. He was disciplined with five (5) days suspension.
The essential facts are that Claimant stopped his engine at initial terminal so that he could get ice and water for the trip. According to his testimony, the total time consumed was about ten (10) minutes.
Based upon the entire record here, the Board finds that the claim has merit. The problem began when the engine was not supplied before Claimant took charge of it... If Claimant was expected to get supplies he should have been told when and how to do it. If he was correcting an omission by another person, he should not be faulted for taking a few minutes to get what was necessary at the beginning of his trip.

                          _2_

PL-S ,~a - 6 W A~UD ~~ . 57Vo

    The discipline assessed in this case was not justified.


                        AHARD


    Claim is allowed.


                          ORDER

The Carrier is ordered to make this Award effective within thirty (30) days from the date shown below.

~. ~~ ~W i
Employee Member Carr~t~

                  Chairman ~Id Neutral Member


Dated: .~2

            ~,s