PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 5512
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
and
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
NORTHEAST CORRIDOR
AWARD NO. 1
System Docket No. NEC-BMWE-SD-3206
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1. The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
advertised all gangs within the Electric Traction -
Department on Advertisements 001/040-PETC-0193 dated
January 25, 1993 within the Philadelphia South Seniority
.District as "Construction" and "Maintenance" gangs.
2. As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (1) above, the bulletins will be rescinded and readvertised so that there is no distinction between construction and maintenance duties.
FINDINGS
Following discussion with the organization, the Carrier
announced its intention to establish gangs in the Electric Traction
Department as either "construction" or "maintenance" gangs.
Previously, no such distinction was made for Electric Traction
Department employees. As a result, positions were posted as
Lineman/Construction, Electrician/ Construction, Lineman/Mainten-
ance, Electrician/Maintenance. The record shows that the Carrier
continued to consider Electric Traction Department Electricians and
Lineman as
qualified for maintenance or construction work, as in
the past.
The Organization argues the Carrier is in violation of the
Agreement by its unilateral change in the long-standing practice
not to designate gangs or employes as separately assigned to
maintenance or construction work. The organization relies on the
Scope Rule and Work Classification Rule, which read in pertinent
part as follows:
A. SCOPE
These rules, subject to the exceptions herein, shall
constitute the agreement between National Railroad
Passenger Corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"AMTRAK", and its respective einployes of the classifications herein set forth, represented by the Brotherhood of
Maintenance of Way Employes, hereinafter referred to as
Brotherhood, engaged in work generally recognized as
Maintenance of Way work, such as, inspection, construction, repairs and maintenance of water facilities,
bridges, culverts, buildings and other structures,
tracks, fences and roadbed, including catenary system,
third rail, substations and transmission in connection
with electric train operation, and work which as of June
1, 1945, was being performed by. these employes, such as
station lighting, power lines, floodlights, on elevators
and drawbridges, and shall govern the rates of pay, rules
and working conditions of such employes.
B. WORK CLASSIFICA.TIQN RULE
ARTICLE III - ELECTRIC TRACTION DEPARTMENT - except
Northern District
The description of each position title outlined in
this Article is intended to cover the primary duties of
that position and, in addition, it is understood that
each title comprehends other work generally recognized as
work of the particular classification.
-2-
55/x--I
16. Electrician-Substation - Constructs, installs,
maintains, repairs and tests Substation switching
apparatus, cable controls and associated batteries..
Operates Substations and protects workmen and work
equipment in proximity of high tension lines or
apparatus.
18. Lineman-- Constructs, installs, maintains and
repairs high voltage transmission and catenary systems,
RULE 65
RATES OF PAY
The rates of pay which have been agreed upon between
the Director of Labor Relations and General Chairman are
a part of this Agreement and are contained in Supplement.
The listing of such rates and positions is for the sole
purpose of providing information with respect to the
rates of pay applicable to such positions and does not in
any way affect Management I's--right to establish new
positions or to abolish any existing position or
positions subsequently established, in accordance with
the provisions of the Schedule Agreement. Where new
classifications are established, rates of pay therefor
will be a matter of negotiation between the General
Chairman and the Director of Labor Relations.
The organization argues, in effect, that the Carrier has
created "new" classifications, in that employes are assigned to
only a portion of the principal duties specified in the appropriate categories of the Work Classification Rule. As a result, the
organization contends that the Carrier has failed to negotiate with
the General Chairman, as provided in Rule 65. The Organization
also emphasizes that this revision constitutes a change from a
long-standing practice.
The Board finds that the organization has failed to demonstrate that the Carriers action is in violation of the Agreement.
It is appropriate for the Carrier to direct employees to undertake
particular tasks (such as maintenance work or construction) within
their classification. There is also no showing that any "new"
classifications have been established, since there are no duties
not covered in the existing classifications. Thus, no action under
Rule 65 is required. While change has been effected, it is not
contrary to rule or to any binding commitment between the parties.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
HERBERT L. MARX, Jr., Chairman and Neutral Mem r
Vivd
RICHARD F. PALMER, Carrier Member
NEW YORK, NY
DATED:
11~
1,ay~