PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 5564
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY B14PLOYES )
Case No. 1
and )
Award No. 1
NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER )
RAILROAD CORPORATION )
Martin H. Malin, Chairman & Neutral-Member
R. C. Robinson, Employee Member
J. S. Morse, Carrier Member
Hearing Date: May 20, 1996
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Carrier violated the Agreement when it called and
assigned Trackmen R. 0. Tovar and L. 0. Alvarez to
perform overtime service operating a ballast regulator
and endloader, respectively, on October 9 and 10, 1993,
rather than calling and assigning Equipment Operators J.
F. Teufel and T. P. Petty
who
were senior, qualified and
available to perform such service (Carrier's File
08-27-172).
2. As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part
(1) above, Claimants Teufel and Petty shall each be
compensated twenty-two (22) hours' pay at their
respective time and one-half rates.
FINDINGS:
Public Law Board No. 5564,
upon
the whole record and all the
evidence, finds and holds that Employee and Carrier are employee
and carrierwithin the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
amended; and, that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
herein; and, that the parties to the dispute were given due
notice of the hearing thereon and did participate therein.
On October 9 and 10, 1993, Carrier called employees Tovar
and Alvarez on an overtime basis to operate two machines that
were not assigned to any employee. The machines were used in a
crossing renewal project at 119th Street on the Rock Island
District.
r
55~y-
The Organization maintains that Carrier should have called
the Claimants because they had greater seniority than the
employees who were called. Carrier. maintains that the Claimants
were headquartered at 179th Street and were performing service on
the Southwest Service District, rather than the Rock Island
District. Consequently, according to Carrier,- it acted in
accordance with the Agreement by calling the most senior
qualified employees assigned to the Rock Island District. The
organization disputes this, relying on the bulletins for the
positions occupied by the Claimants which show the positions as
being in the Rock Island District.
This case turns entirely on whether Claimants were
performing service in the Southwest Service District or the Rock
Island District. We agree with Carrier that Side Letter No:-8 of
the Agreement provides for the distribution of overtime that
accrues within the respective service districts. In accordance
with the Agreement, positions headquartered at 179th Street fell
within the Southwest Service District (the former Norfolk and
Southern line). Although the bulletins erroneously listed the
positions under the heading Rock Island District, the bulletins
cannot change the Agreement. In any conflict between the
bulletins and the Agreement, the Agreement must control.
Accordingly, we conclude that Carrier-called the most senior
qualified employees within the Rock Island Districtto perform
overtime service in the Rock Island District. In so doing,
Carrier acted in conformity with the Agreement.
AWARD
Claim denied.
Martin H. Malin, Chairman
u I
, 1";,
Carrier Member Emplo ee Member
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, August 29, 1996.