PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 5564
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES )
Case No. 10
and )
Award No. 8
NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER )
RAILROAD CORPORATION )
Martin H. Malin, Chairman & Neutral Member
R. C. Robinson, Employee Member
J. E. Butler, Carrier Member
Hearing Date: November 17, 1997
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The Agreement was violated when the Carrier improperly
closed the service record of employe M. Ewing (System
File C-18-96-F020-O1-M/08-13-247).
2. As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part
(1) above, the Claimant shall be returned to service
with seniority and all other rights unimpaired.
FINDINGS:
Public Law Board No. 5564, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds and holds that Employee and Carrier are employee
and carrier within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
amended; and, that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
herein; and, that the parties to the dispute were given due
notice of the hearing thereon and did participate therein.
On December 23, 1995, Claimant was furloughed. On January
31, 1996, Claimant was notified that his seniority had been
terminated pursuant to Rule 9 (G), which provides, in relevant
part:
(1) When employees are furloughed by reasons of force
reduction and desire to retain their seniority rights, they
must file their name and address in writing on the form
provided by the Carrier not later than ten (10) calendar
days from date cut off. This notice from the employee must
be sent in triplicate to the Carrier official extending the
5-6(
'OY
-8
notice of force reduction and a copy of this notice must be
sent to the General Chairman at the same time. The officer
receiving said notice shall date, sign and return one copy
each to the employee and the General Chairman. Periodic
renewal of address is not thereafter required, but it is the
responsibility of the employee to advise promptly in similar
manner of any change in address.
(3) Failure to comply with Paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
Section will cause automatic forfeiture of seniority and
employment relationship with the Carrier.
The organization contends that Claimant filed his name and
address on December 26, 1995, well within the ten day period.
Carrier disputes this, contending that Claimant failed to file.
The Board has reviewed the record carefully. The record
contains a statement from Claimant that he came to the Blue
Island District office on December 26, 1995, to pick up his
paycheck and completed the form and gave it to the receptionist.
All other evidence in the record is to the contrary.
First, Rule 9 provides that the employee should have the
form signed by the relevant Carrier official and obtain a copy in
return. Claimant admittedly did not have a copy signed by the
relevant official and returned to him. Second, Rule 9 requires
that the form be filed simultaneously with the General Chairman.
It appears that Claimant never filed the form with the General
Chairman, yet if Claimant really had filed the form at Blue
Island on December 26, we would expect him to have simultaneously
sent it to the General Chairman. Third, the relevant Carrier
official never received Claimant's form. Finally, Claimant's
credibility was damaged severely because on January 30, 1996, he
attempted to get two Carrier employees to backdate a form for
him.
Considering the record as a whole, we must find that
Claimant failed to file his name and address on December 26,
1995, or on any other date within the required time period. This
is not a case like Award No. 6, where there were substantial
mitigating factors. We see no reason not to apply Rule 9 to the
instant case.
2
AWARD
Claim denied.
Martin H. Malin, Chairman
J.
L
Butler, R. C. Robi son
Ca ier Member Empl yee Member
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, December 23, 1997.
3