PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 5606
PARTIES) BROTHERHOOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
) DIVISION OF THE INT'L BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
TO )
DISPUTE ) SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
1. The five (5) day suspension assessed Maintenance Foreman Larry
Cookson for violation of Rule PGR-D in connection with a
personal injury sustained on December 17, 2007 is based on
unproven charges, unjust, unwarranted, and in violation of the
Agreement.
2. As a consequence of Part 1 above, Mr. Cookson shall be
exonerated, the discipline assessed shall be removed from his
record and he shall be made whole for any and all losses he may
have sustained as a result of the discipline assessed. (Carrier File
MW-0$-02 )
FINDINGS:
The Board, after hearing upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that the
parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as amended; this Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and,
the parties were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On the morning of December 17, 2007, Claimant, a Maintenance Foreman, was sent
by the Carrier to check on a report of a broken rail underneath the second engine of
a train that had derailed on the mainline of the Madison Branch between Mile Post
14 and Mile Post 15. At the time the outdoor temperature was 20 degrees, and the
rail was heavily covered with snow. After assisting with the re-railing of the engine,
Claimant and a trackman cleared snow away from the broken rail area with shovels
in an effort to find the end of the rail that was in need of replacement. While
inspecting the rail for a joint bar, Claimant used a gloved hand to brush away some
snow that was stuck to the top and side of the rail. In doing so, a sliver of steel, a
little larger than a sewing needle, ran through the middle finger of Claimant's
gloved right hand. Claimant was taken to the hospital for removal of the sliver of
steel and treatment of his punctured finger. Following this emergency medical
treatment, Claimant immediately returned to full-time duty.
AWARD NO. 72
PLB No. 5606
CASE No. 72
It is the position of the Carrier that Claimant violated Safety Rule PGR-D in a
failure to perform his assigned duties in a safe and proper manner so as to avoid
injury. It says Claimant could have used a shovel or a broom to have cleared the rail
of snow, as opposed to his hand. Further, the Carrier says Claimant admitted from
prior experience at derailments that there is the potential for slivers of steel on the
track. Accordingly, the Carrier says its administration of discipline in the form of a
suspension from service without pay for five days was reasonable and appropriate.
Safety Rule PGR-D reads as follows:
Employees must exercise care to prevent injury to themselves or
others. They must be alert and attentive at all times when performing
their duties and plan their work to avoid injury.
Asked by the hearing officer at the company's disciplinary investigation to describe
what happened when the injury occurred, Claimant said:
What happened I was up, I was sent up there to change, and look at a
derailment where the train was and it had broke, there was, it had
broke the rail that it was on because, because of a VSH [vertical split
head] it had snapped the rail out so we laid the rail down so the train,
to get the train over, the rest of the way over it and then I was
measuring, shoveling down beside the rail to see what the length of the
rail was to change it and I had come to what I thought was a joint and
then I see it was a strap so I shoveled a little further and I come to
another what I thought was a joint but it was just another strap and
then I when I shoveled a little further I come to another joint and
that's when I got down and I was, shoveled away some of the snow
and it was still stuck to the part of the rail so I just wiped some of it to
see what it was and that's when I got the sliver in my, through my
finger.
In study of the hearing record the Board finds it noteworthy that when one of the
Carrier's investigating officers was questioned as to whether there was any other
way of getting the snow removed from the rail joint other than using a gloved hand,
said: "Well if they would've had a broom with them well or something like that.. ."
Asked if a broom or something else was available to clean the joint, this witness said
he did not believe a broom was there and that the nearest one was back in a truck
about two miles distant from the derailment.
The Board also notes that both this witness, and another Carrier witness, basically
acknowledged that it was not an uncommon practice for track workers to brush a
gloved hand across rail to clear it of snow stuck to it in a manner not unlike that
which was done by the Claimant in this instance.
Page 2
PLB No. 5606
AWARD NO. 72
CASE NO. 72
At the time of the incident, Claimant was an employee of the Carrier for about ten
years. This injury was said to be Claimant's first injury since he joined the
railroad. A Carrier witness, who said Clamant had worked for him as a foreman
for five to six years, went on to state that he had found Clamant to be a safe and
conscientious employee; knowledgeable of his work duties; and, having had very
good work habits. In terms of past discipline, the record shows but one prior
offense, a 30-day suspension administered under date of September 19, 2006 for
having left a switch in the reversed position.
There is no question that Claimant sustained an on-the-job injury. However, the
Board does not find the mere fact of an injury having been sustained sufficient to
conclude that Claimant had not been alert and attentive when performing his
assigned duties so as to avoid injury. As stated above, testimony of record shows
that it was not an uncommon practice for track workers, in seeking to locate the
joint of a rail, to brush snow from the top or side of a rail with a gloved hand in the
same manner as did Claimant. Further, notwithstanding this apparent Carrier
knowledge of such practice, nothing of record was presented to show that track
workers had been told or instructed that it was unsafe to do so.
Under the circumstances, the Board will direct that discipline as administered be
expunged from Claimant's record and that he be compensated for any and all time
lost.
AWARD:
Claim sustained.
Robert E. Peterson
Chair & Neutral Member
Anthony F. Lomanto
Carrier Member
Stuart A. Hulburt, Jr.
Organization Member
'Forth Billerica, MA
Dated
~'i%'f",~
I:.
v.~
Page 3