PARTIES) BROTHERHOOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
) DIVISION OF THE INT'L BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
TO )
DISPUTE ) SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





FINDINGS:

The Board, after hearing upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended; this Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and, the parties were given due notice of hearing thereon.


On the morning of December 17, 2007, Claimant, a Maintenance Foreman, was sent by the Carrier to check on a report of a broken rail underneath the second engine of a train that had derailed on the mainline of the Madison Branch between Mile Post 14 and Mile Post 15. At the time the outdoor temperature was 20 degrees, and the rail was heavily covered with snow. After assisting with the re-railing of the engine, Claimant and a trackman cleared snow away from the broken rail area with shovels in an effort to find the end of the rail that was in need of replacement. While inspecting the rail for a joint bar, Claimant used a gloved hand to brush away some snow that was stuck to the top and side of the rail. In doing so, a sliver of steel, a little larger than a sewing needle, ran through the middle finger of Claimant's gloved right hand. Claimant was taken to the hospital for removal of the sliver of steel and treatment of his punctured finger. Following this emergency medical treatment, Claimant immediately returned to full-time duty.

AWARD NO. 72
PLB No. 5606 CASE No. 72










PLB No. 5606

AWARD NO. 72
CASE NO. 72

At the time of the incident, Claimant was an employee of the Carrier for about ten years. This injury was said to be Claimant's first injury since he joined the railroad. A Carrier witness, who said Clamant had worked for him as a foreman for five to six years, went on to state that he had found Clamant to be a safe and conscientious employee; knowledgeable of his work duties; and, having had very good work habits. In terms of past discipline, the record shows but one prior offense, a 30-day suspension administered under date of September 19, 2006 for having left a switch in the reversed position.


There is no question that Claimant sustained an on-the-job injury. However, the Board does not find the mere fact of an injury having been sustained sufficient to conclude that Claimant had not been alert and attentive when performing his assigned duties so as to avoid injury. As stated above, testimony of record shows that it was not an uncommon practice for track workers, in seeking to locate the joint of a rail, to brush snow from the top or side of a rail with a gloved hand in the same manner as did Claimant. Further, notwithstanding this apparent Carrier knowledge of such practice, nothing of record was presented to show that track workers had been told or instructed that it was unsafe to do so.


Under the circumstances, the Board will direct that discipline as administered be expunged from Claimant's record and that he be compensated for any and all time lost.


AWARD:

Claim sustained.

Robert E. Peterson
Chair & Neutral Member

Anthony F. Lomanto

Carrier Member


Stuart A. Hulburt, Jr.
Organization Member

'Forth Billerica, MA
Dated ~'i%'f",~ I:. v.~

Page 3