PUBLIC LAW BOc1RD N0. 566
Pennsylvania Federation Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
VS.
PENN CENTRAL. TRANSPORTATION CO:,1PANY
STAMEVT OF CLAIII:"Claim in behalf of A. Ruggiere, et al. claiming 8
hours Eoliday Pay for each for September 5, 1960,
as provided for in the August 19, 1960 Agreement."
OPINION OF BOARD:
Because of a strike by shop craft empl,~yres of the
former Pennsylvania Railroad Company commencing on September 1, 1960,
Claimants' positions were "temporarily suspended" effective September
1, 1960. The strike terminated on September 12, 1960 and pursuant to
agreement between the parties, Claimants were returned to the positions
they had occupied immediately prior to the strike.
Claims were submitted by the organization for 8 hours
Holiday pay for Labor Day (September 5, 1960) in accordance with the
provisions of Article II of the August 21, 1954 Agreement and Article
III of the August 19, 1960 6greenent.
The facts and issues presented in this dispute have
been the subject of many awards of the National Railroad Adjustment
Board, including awards on this property, These awards have almost
uniformly held that since Claimants did not lay off on their own
accord, were available for service and satisfied the requirements
of Article III, Section 1, Subsection ii of the August 19, 1960 Agreement, the claims should be sustained. See Awards 14730, 14590, 14675,
14635, 14625 and 14515.
Tile Board can find no reason or basis to deviate from
these awards.
Carrier raises the further defense to the effect that
"it is an entirely reasonable conclusion that the Claimants, in any
event, would not have crossed. the picket lines established across the
property by the striking Shop Craft employees even if work had been
available to them." c~,
IC.;
'~1
N. R.A.6.~L
ADM. O~FiCs-
,~
PL a
5
/I
rjja-rd
_ 2
Conjecture and assumption cannot, under any circumstance, be the basis for denying or sustaining a claim, The record
fails to disclose evidence of a request by Carrier or a refusal by
the Organization to cross picket lines to return to work. Moreover,
Carrier gave specific instructions to the employees not to return to
work until the strike was terminated.
It is clear from the Agreements that this claim
does not include those Claimants who are monthly rated, and such
claims are accordingly dismissed.
AWIM: Claim sustained consistent with the Opinion
herein. Order date is 30 days from the date of this award.
PUBLIC LAW 30AI~D N0. 566
/s/ Nicholas H. Zumas
Nicholas H. Zumas, Chairman
/s/ A. J. Cunningham /s/ S. J. Wilson
A. J. Cunningham, Employe Member S. J. Wilson, Carrier Member
Signed and dated at Philadelphia, Penna. December 18,
1970