ORGANIZATION CASE: HNC-4149
PtTDLIC L71N DOW NO. 5786
PARTIBB TO
plum:
UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION )
)
VS ) ME CASE NO. 1
1 AWARD NO. 1
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. )
(FORMERLY CHESAPEAKE 4 OHIO )
RAILWAY
COMPANY PM/HV) )
STAMM
or
C&AIK*
Appeal Claim
Of
Brakeman M. a. bumas-075151 for reinstatement
of seniority, unimpaired, that his record be cleared of
the
event
and he be compensated for all lost earnings in accordance with
Article 11 of
the
governing agreement, account dismissal from
service of the Carrier, as a result of an investigation held in
Walbridge, Ohio at 1200 hours on Tuesday. .tune 7.
1994.
FINDINGS AND OPT
The
Carrier and the Employees involved is this dispute are
'respectively Carrier and employees within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act. as amended. This Board has jurisdiction of the
dispute here involved.
For the record we should here note that the former Chairman
and Neutral Member of this Public Law Board rendered an interim
award under date of April 11,
1996,
reading in part as follows:
-Brakeman H. P. Dumas shall be reinstated to his former
position with seniority and all other rights unimpaired.
with
the understanding that the resolution of all other issues,
including the claim for back pay would be dealt with when the
entire award was issued.
Claimant in this dispute was last employed by Carrier on
October 23, 1969 and at the time of this incident had accumulated
approximately 25 years of service.
Under date of June 2, 1994, a letter, reading as follows, was
sent to this claimantx
"You are charged with being accident and injury prone in
that you have sustained eight (8) on-duty personal
injuries since April 9, 1974. The dates of the injuries
are listed below:
PL.6
No. 572>b
award No. 1
.Z.
April 9,
1974
nay 25, 1975
November 15, 1975
September
14,
1981
September 21, 1988
August 25, 1994
October 14, 1993
Nay 19, 1994
',You are instructed to attend investigation to convene
immediately following the investigation previously
scheduled on Jung 7. 1994 at 1000 hours in the conference
Room, Administration Building, 239 West union street.
Walbridge, Ohio. You will be withheld from service
pending the outcome of this investigation.
"You are responsible for arranging for a representative
and any witnesses you may desire."
The investigation was held as scheduled and as a result
thereof Carrier notified claimant, under date of June 15. 1994, of
its decision to dismiss him from service.
This Board has closely examined the record in this cage and we
note that during claimant's years of service he did report having
suffered personal on-duty injury on eight separate occasions,
however, most of the injuries were minor in nature and resulted in
little or no lost time.
The submissions of the parties have directed our attention to
the fact that there are two recent awards rendered on this Carrier
involving the issue of "Accident Prone." ,ward
No.
32 of Public
Law Board No. 4833 was rendered on December 9, 1992 and Award No.
1 of Public Law Board No. 5471 was rendered on January 19, 1994.
in both
of the cited awards it was held that before an
employee could be discharged on such - charge. there had to be a
review of all the evidence and documentation surrounding the
employee's accident record. The Boards then went on to find that
in those cases there was no such review in that the Carrier officer
who introduced the summary of the claimant's accident record at the
investigation testified he had no personal knowledge o£ the
reported incidents.
In light of the findings in both of the prior awards above
referred to, it is difficult to understand the action here in June
of 1994 where carrier finds an employee to be "accident prone" when
the record is explicitly clear that the Carrier officer who
introduced claimant's accident record at the investigation freely
admitted that he had no personal knowledge of the reported
injuries.
Y
U _~_
Based on the record here in its entirety, this Board is unable
to find that the reporting of eight on-duty Lnjuries. during a
career that spanned 75 years, warrants a finding that claimant is
accident prone and thereby subject to dismissal from service.
Under the circumstances we must hold that Carrier erred in its
decision to dismiss claimant from service and that claimant. who
was reinstated to service by the above referenced interim decision,
shall now have the dismissal notation removed from his personal
record and be paid for all time lost.
AWARD
claim sustained. Carrier is instructed to comply with this
Award within 30 days of the date hereof.
F. T. ·Lyn Neutral
Chairman
oy F. · 1. J , carrier Member .
Robert W. Barley, mployee
Member
Award date
ZY
-1-
46- Af