EM, TiE$ TO DISPUTE:


STMINI flF CLAIM:



, fIN,Qi

Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the RaiMray Labor Act, as amended. Further, the Board Is duly constituted by Agreement, has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter, and the Parties to this dispute were gluon due notice of the hearing thereon.

This is the final of three cases involving Claimant (see Cases 184 and !66) wherein he tiled to protect a vacancy at Macomb, Illinois. He was absent without authority October t8 thru 26,1999.


Page 2

rnd, thus leaving true evidence Carrier presented standing unchallenged.
Claimant had the opportunft to defend himself, to prssant evidence supporting
the flryanEtation's post -Investigation claim that Claimant was never ass%ned to Macomb.


The Organization raised the Issue of Carrier's failure to natNy the "appropriate Local Organization Repreaentathre." This issue has been fully discussed in Case No. 164 of this Board and wrist has barn said there is incorporated In its entirety to this Award.



    Claim dented.


                        ORDER

Thin Hoard, sitar consideration of the dispute identllied above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Clairttant<s) not be made.

              ,,~ .,


                        ~ . ~c;~'~

              Robert L. Hicks, Chairman A Neutral Member


Rick B. YVahrli, Labor Member

Dated: j~ G
~ 4,5~"`

Award No. 144

Cm No· 166

y

T as M. o~ Carrier Mburr