(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PAFtT1E,TQ _DISPUTE:


_ ?he Carrier violated the Agreement when on October 12, 2000, Mr.



1K(XNG,a


Upon the whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employ" within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended. Further, the Board is duly constituted by Agreement, has jurltd'~cdon of the Parties and of the subject matter, and the Parties to this dispute ware given due notice of the hearing thereon.

On September 22, 2000, the Carrier wrote Claimant setting an Investigation because of his:

    "...alleged failure to comply with written inatrucdan: per Cert!lled fetter,

    7099 3220 0004 3636 8445, of September 1, 2000; your alleged absence

    without proper authority from May 5, 2000 to the present date far failure to

    provide proper documentation to substantiate your Reeve of absence;

    possible violation of Rules 1.43 and 1.15, Maintenance of Way Operating

Page 2 Award lea. i ~r q
Came No. 1!t

    Ruits: .ltrcdv. January 3,, 1299, innlufint r. mr ~tlvo April 2.


        *...H


    Claimant who received )htr above eottoer elected not do lftnd which is his rfght


under these clrcu rug:, bit dome at his potli.
The Carrier at tit lttvitsftsllctn fiurrttalaad oubstantia! evidence of Glalrrsnt's failure to comply with Csrrisr's Instructions, snit sines Claimant did not Sland, the evidence remained unrefuted.
Tha dlaclptttrar of dismissal under these circumstances is teat sn abuse of Carritps suthoft.

                        AWM


    Ctalm dented.


                        ORDIB


    This Board, after consldsration o! the dlspwta Wantitiad above, hereby orders that


an award favorable to the C1almantts) not b: made.

                    I


              Robert t.. Hicks, Chairman x Neutral 1111glaber


    s


Rick B. WOOL Labor Member homsa It ft ohlt
rgr arrtir Aber

Drhrd:A t,,, L'~s/'. C ! ,,2- a I ~

i