(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (The Burlington Northam Santa Fe Railroad (Former (ATSF Railway Company) STATEMENT OF CLAIM:















to Rule 13 and Appendix 11, because the Carrier did not introduce
substantial, credible evidence that proved the Claimant violated the
rules enumerated in their decision.
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record and ail the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended. Further, the Board is duty constItuLSd by Agreement, has jurisdiction of the Parties and of the subject matter, and the Partles to this dispute were given due notice of the hearing thereon.
On October 28, 2002, Claimants were performing boutat welds. In the process of aligning the rail ends to accomplish the weld, Claimant Anaya was hammering a wedge.
PLB No- S85D
Page 2 Award No. Z15


A chip broke loose from the wedge when hammered and lodged in Claimant Geees neck which had to be surgically removed.

After a raenaciment of the incident, both Claimants received a letter dated November 13, 2002, to appear at an Investigation to determine their responsibility, If any:


      '...conceming your alleged use of a defective welding wedge ...."

Following the Investigation, the Carrier assessed both Claimants the discipline set forth in Item I of the Statement of Claim.

The investigation clearly established that the wedge used had chips missing. It should have been turned in and a new replacement sought, but this did not happen.

This Board does not believe Claimant Gear, who was injured, committed any violation. He, in essence, was the helper to Claimant Anaya who has the tide of Lead Welder. Claimant Anaya was in charge and he was responsible for the use of the defective wedge. Claimant Geer's record Is to be cleared of all traces of this investigation, and he Is to be compensated for any time lost as provided in the Schedule Agreement.

Most of the discipline assessed Claimant Anaya will stand; however, the three year probationary period will be reduced to one year.


                        AWARD


      Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.


                        ORDER

This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier Is ordered to make the award effective on or before 30 days following the date the award Is adopted.

' PJ-B No- S85D
' Page 3 Award No. 215
Case No. 215

                    Robert L Hicks, Chairman 3 Neutral Member


        Rick . Wehrli, Labor Member Thomas M. Rohllng, Carrier Me


        Dated: MGrltn I3, Aoo3