PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 5850
Award No.
a
Case No. 280
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employs
PARTIES TODJ§PI,ITE:
(The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (Former
(ATSF Ralhway Company)
STATEMENT OE
CLAN:
1. The Carrier violated the Agreement on February 16, 2005 when k
dismissed Claimant, V. Rub:, for allegedly testing positive for
drugWalcohol a second time within 10 years.
2. AB
a consequence of the violation referred to in part (1), the Carrier
shall Immediately raWm the Clahntlmt
to
service
with
asPlor#y vacation
and all other rights restored, remove any mention of this incident from
his personal record, and make him whole for any wages lost beginning
February 16, 2005 forward.
FIPONGS
Upon tire whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties
herein an Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Rallaiay Labor Act, as
amended. Further, the Board is duly constituted by Agreement, has jurisdiction of the
Parties and of the subject matter, and the Parties to this dispute were given due notice of
the hearing thereon.
On February 18, 2005, the Carrier wrote Claimant the following letter terminating
his employment:
"Dear Mr. Rutz:
1 have been advised by the Carrier's Medical Department, that you have
violated the Carrier's Policy on the Use of Alcohol and Drugs by tasting
positive for alcohol, during a follow up drug and alcohol test on
Wednesday, February 16, 2005. Furthermore, Carrier records disclose that
this is the second in a tan year period that you tested pas" under the
Carrier's policy. The first violation occurred on April 9, 2001, when you
tested positive for Cocaine. `
Page 2 Award No. 2 S'O
Case No. 280
in accordance with Carrier's stated policies and practices, Carrier shall
dismiss from service empbyess who have more than one confirmed
positive test for alcohol or a controlled substance, obtained under any
circumstances, during any 10-year period. Therefore, efiecthre knrnediatsty
the Carrier is terminating your seniority and employment with the
Burlington Northam Santa Fe Roomy.
Pursuant to the Letters of Understanding dated June 24, 1991, and
December 29, 2003, between the Carrier and the Brotherhood of
OAainbonance of Way Employees; ff you dispute this action, a claim for your
reinstatement may be filed on your behalf within sixty (60) days from the
date of this letter.
Please acknowledge receipt by signing and datlng the second copy of this
letter and returning it in the enclosed self-addressed erwelope,
Arrange to return all Company property and any Amtrak transportation
passes In your possession."
As outlined in the aforequoted termination letter, Claimant had the right to and did
file a timely claim. The February 16, 2005, drug and alcohol test was done randomly
pursuant to the understanding the Carrier reached with the Claimant following his first
failed test pursuant to the following letter.
"You have satisfactorily completed the necessary requirements following
your posltavs tast. Please be advised that you are now subject to periodic
testing for a period of fire (5) years from the date you return tD work. When
a follow-up
test Is required, you will be notified by the proper authority.
Before you may return to active service, it
is.
your respotalbift to contact
your supervisor and comply with any other conditions that haw been set
forth as a result of your poeltim tsst.
Violation of any ors of more of the following conditions will sqtfisct you to
dismisses
:
· More than one confirmed positive test either for any controlled
substance or alcohol, obtained under any circumstances during any
1o-year period.
· A single confirmed positive test either for any controlled substance
or alcohol obtained under any circumstances within throe years of
any `serious offense' as defined by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe
'Policy for Employee Performance Accountability.'
Page 3
Award No. P80
Case No. 260
Failure to
abide by the instructions of tie Medical & Environrnantel
Department and/or Employee Ass nee Program regarding
treatment, education and folkrhwp testing.
· Failure to provide a urine or breath alcohol specimen without a valid,
wrMkd medical explanation.
· Adulteration, substitution or dilution of urine samples.
· Possession of alcohol, controlled substance, Illegally obtained
drugs, adulterant substance, or drug paraphernalia on BNSF
property obtained under any circumstances as fbliows:
· within S years of any 'serious offense' as defined by the Burlington
Northern Santa Fe 'Policy for Employee Pertonnance
Accountabolty', or
· within 10 years of a confirmed positive test either for any controlled
substance to alcohol, or
· involving a criminal conv."
Claimant signed the above statement wherein he indicated he read and
understood the conditions under which he had regained his seniority for the first
violation.
Claimant's serves were terminated pursuant to two Letters of Understanding,
one date June 21, 1891, and the other dated December 29, 2003.
The claim filed
in
Claimant's behalf lacks evidence that the failed drug test was in
error. Pursuant to the aforementioned two Letters of
Understanding, Carrier's
actkoruE
were proper.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an award favorable to the Claknant(s) not be made.
RiAwwrt L Hicks, ChairmanN utral AAember
-z
Rick B. Wehrll, Labor Member Samantha Rogers, Cask ber
Dated:
dp~,-j
a(,,)«61,