(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employs PARTIES TODJ§PI,ITE: (The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (Former (ATSF Ralhway Company) STATEMENT OE CLAN:



FIPONGS

Upon tire whole record and all the evidence, the Board finds that the parties herein an Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Rallaiay Labor Act, as amended. Further, the Board is duly constituted by Agreement, has jurisdiction of the Parties and of the subject matter, and the Parties to this dispute were given due notice of the hearing thereon.

On February 18, 2005, the Carrier wrote Claimant the following letter terminating his employment:





Page 2 Award No. 2 S'O
Case No. 280




As outlined in the aforequoted termination letter, Claimant had the right to and did file a timely claim. The February 16, 2005, drug and alcohol test was done randomly pursuant to the understanding the Carrier reached with the Claimant following his first failed test pursuant to the following letter.




Page 3

                                              Case No. 260


          Failure to abide by the instructions of tie Medical & Environrnantel Department and/or Employee Ass nee Program regarding treatment, education and folkrhwp testing.

          · Failure to provide a urine or breath alcohol specimen without a valid, wrMkd medical explanation.

        · Adulteration, substitution or dilution of urine samples.

          · Possession of alcohol, controlled substance, Illegally obtained drugs, adulterant substance, or drug paraphernalia on BNSF property obtained under any circumstances as fbliows:

          · within S years of any 'serious offense' as defined by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe 'Policy for Employee Pertonnance Accountabolty', or

          · within 10 years of a confirmed positive test either for any controlled substance to alcohol, or

        · involving a criminal conv."

Claimant signed the above statement wherein he indicated he read and understood the conditions under which he had regained his seniority for the first violation.
Claimant's serves were terminated pursuant to two Letters of Understanding, one date June 21, 1891, and the other dated December 29, 2003.
The claim filed in Claimant's behalf lacks evidence that the failed drug test was in error. Pursuant to the aforementioned two Letters of Understanding, Carrier's actkoruE were proper.

                          AWARD

      Claim denied.

                          ORDER


      This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that

an award favorable to the Claknant(s) not be made.
RiAwwrt L Hicks, ChairmanN utral AAember
-z
Rick B. Wehrll, Labor Member Samantha Rogers, Cask ber
Dated: dp~,-j a(,,)«61,