PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 5850


image


BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES


vs.


BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY


image

Case No. 491 - Award No. 491 - Becenti Carrier File No. 14-15-0118

Organization File No. 2400-SF13Al-1430


image


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:


Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:


  1. The Carrier violated the Agreement commencing February 6, 2015 when Claimant, Steven P. Becenti (6596571), was disciplined with a Level S 30-day Record Suspension with a 3-year review period for his alleged failure to report for duty on Tuesday November 11, 2014 continuing through November 17, 2014 without approval, while assigned as a laborer on the RG402 support gang. The Carrier alleged violation of Maintenance of Way Operating Rule (MOWOR) 1.15 Duty, Reporting, or Absence.


  2. As a consequence of the violation referred to in part 1 the Carrier shall remove from Claimant's record this discipline and paid for all wage commencing February 6, 201 5, continuing forward and/or otherwise made whole.


FINDINGS:


Public Law Board No. 5850, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended; that the Board has jurisdiction over the dispute herein; and that the parties to the dispute were given due notice of the hearing and did participate therein.


Claimant, Steven P. Becenti, has been employed by the Carrier since 1994. On November 19, 2014, the Carrier notified Claimant to attend an investigation to ascertain the facts and determine his responsibility, if any, in connection with his alleged failure to report for duty on Tuesday November 11, 2014 continuing through ovember 17. 2014

without approval, while assigned as a laborer on the RG 402 support gang. Following the investigation, the Carrier found that Claimant had committed the misconduct alleged, in violation of MOWOR 1 . 1 5 Duty Reporting or Absence, and assessed him a Level S 30 Day Record Suspension.


The facts of this case are not in dispute. At the time at issue, Claimant was working as a Trackman out of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Assistant Roadmaster Jeremy Fri=incisco testified at the investigation that his Foreman , Chris Gonzalez, informed him that an employee, Claimant, was to hump onto their gang on November 10, 2014, but needed to work out some arrangements and would not arrive until November 11 , 2014. A few days later, he stated, the Foreman told him Claimant had not appeared, and he was concerned that something might be wrong. Mr. Francisco checked with Carrier Manpower to make sure Claimant was not working in another location , and they determined that was not the case. They contacted memb ers of Claimant's previous gang, but no one had talked to him since he left. The supervisors also contacted the Albuquerque Police Department to perform a wellness check on Claimant.


Mr. Francisco stated that on November 18, 2014 Claimant left a message on Foreman Gonzalez' voicemail. That, he explained, was their first contact with Claimant.


Claimant testified at the investigation that as he was preparing to join the gang a close friend of his was killed in a car accident. He explained that he felt guilty about it, because the friend was driving a long distance, and he told him to call Claimant if there wen any problems, but Claimant did not answer his phone on the night of the accident.


Claimant stated that he lost his equilibrium and apparently began drinking, until he finally called the Carrier's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) and sent him for help. He added that he had been attending meetings and getting other assistance since, and that the EAP had helped him deal with the tragedy.


Claimant admitted that he did not report for work November 11, 2014 and that he made no attempt to contact the Carrier thereafter. Claimant also acknowledged that he had absenteeism problems in the past.


Claimant's personal record shows a Level S record suspension, with a 12-month review period, assessed on April 16, 2014 for absence without authority, and a similar violation in 2008.


The Carrier asserts that this case is not complicated. The record shows that Claimant told his Foreman he would report on November 11, 2014, but failed to come to work for days. The Carrier points out that after it attempted to determine if he was working elsewhere and contacted the police to make sure Claimant was safe, Claimant finally left Foreman Gonzalez a voicemail on November 18, 2014.


Although the Organization contends that Claimant was suffering from a serious medical condition, the Carrier states that its employees must report such problems to the


PLB 5850, Case No. 491

Page 2 of3

image


21