- PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO 5850 -
Award No.
Case No. 5
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: -
(The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad
STATEMENT OF C -.-UM: - -_
Carrier's decision to dismiss Central Region Maintenance of Way employee 1\I. RI.
Ortiz- effective October 23. 1995 was unjust.
Accordingly. Carrier should now be required to reinstate the claiittmtt to service with
his setllorlty rights unimpaired and competuate ltfn for all wages lost from October 23.
1995. (Files95-11-160/140-1312-9513)
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record and all the evidence. the Board finds that the parties herein are carrier
and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended. Further. the Board is duly
constituted by Agreement. hats jurisdiction of the Parties and of the subject matter. and the Parties to this
dispute were given due notice of the hearing thereon.
The Carrier's Drug and Alcohol Policy clearly stipulates that:
`Those employes who have tested positive in the past ten (10) years would be
subject to disrtzissal whenever they test positive a second time'
11ie parties have agreed that:
'`...an employe who is subject to dismissal under the aforequoted provisions ... sliall be
notified in writing by Certified Mail, Return Receipt requested. to the employee's last
known address. copy to the General Chainuan. of termination of his seniority and
employment .... _,
Claitttant. in November of 1994. tested positive for
a
prohibitive substance and was placed on
medical leave. He was permitted to resume service on Jaumai-v 9. 1995. with the proviso that tbr the
nest two years he would be subject to random testing. On August 9. 1995. he tested positive and
I'&
_6 Nc1.
,1' a -,e'3 Award No. S
Caso No.
following a timely held Investigation. lie was dismissed from all service with the Carrier.
Tlle Carrier has substantiated its charge and has conclusively established Claunant's culpability.
This being the second trine within ten years. Claimant's dismissal was in accordance with agreement
Rules. - _
The fact that tile first evaluation determined that Claimant was not in need of rehabilitation does -
not negate the Understanding of June 2-4. 1991. that employees testing positive for the second time
Nvitltirl tern verus will be terminated. Claimant should have been fit lly cognizant of the consequences of
testing positive a second tune. Tile discipline was prescribed in the Agreement. It will not be disturbed.
aw-
Claim denied.
ORDER Board. after consideration of the dispute identified above. hereby orders that an award
favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
Robert L. Ilicla
Chaimlan and Neutral Member
.e -
. F0OSe 6feg
11
Labor Member Carrier Member
Dated 73
`l9~ -